Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: fuel limiting before 3200

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    11

    Default fuel limiting before 3200

    Don't slaughter me too hard, or do if you please. I've searched to no avail.

    07.5 LMM 12628594 os, dsp5 conversion. 12mm stroker, 100 overs, 68mm vgt in valley, 480 over. Truck has been driven well on purchased tunes without 480 for 5-6 years. Added more air, wanted more duration to compliment that air. A little data logging gave me some limits to work around.

    I modified the duration, and timing of the non dsp slot and slot 4, adjusted pedal position a to 886 in the bigger end and tapered it back, I figured I'd get those bugs worked out first.

    non dsp or dsp 4, truck main injection flow rate does not even come close to calculated flow rate until about 3200rpm. Once I breach 3200 it comes alive. The injector pulse being commanded matches closely to the main injection flow rate.

    I can not seem to record torque data on v7.5. says gm.trqeng_b is not a valid pid when I'm connected the e35b lmm ecm. no torque pids are once connected.
    So I added it in on bbx and used the v2 for what it's for, not worrying about your laptop flying when having to brake hard. Pulled log through explorer, loaded it on the 7.5 scan, won't play back.
    I've read about this somewhere else. I haven't researched it yet, but v2 is all up to date, as is software. So next step, watch the data and worry about that other stuff later.

    So I go on another run, find that the trqeng_b maxes out at 443 ft lbs. this can't be right, I haven't changed any torque based fuel tables, pedal position should be requesting 897 ftlbs, it's main fuel rate is 72mm3, calculated fuel is 95mm3, but pulse time is 931uS which is in between 70-75 @ 180 MPa which pressure was at. Once I reach 31xx-32xx the main rate goes to 105 and calculated is within ~10

    does this on the non dsp and dsp 4. so I know I'm sharing the issue in another table. I have at this point maxed b1117, b1118, b1119, b1186, b1128, b1192, b1152, b1153, b1154, b1155, b1156, b1157, I've modified d5196 in the tcm played with d5197 on every setting.

    obviously I've got to get some data recording figured out, It clearly not going to help much if the v2 trqeng_b is real, so it would track in the wrong parts of the tables. I am not commanding 72 anywhere in the 443 sections.

    I do not see what is requesting the reduction in any multiplier but allows it to go away at 3100-3200 area. Outside of continuing this trend of table by table disabling shit until it cooperates, It's making me nutty. I appreciate all opinions and thoughts.

  2. #2
    Lifetime Member GMC-2002-Dmax's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,294

    Default

    What is MAF reading currently?

    Adding a second charger and relocating the MAF Sensor is likely the issue.

    Get a MAF Data log of a 100% stock truck, then compare to your logged flow, I bet the flow on the truck with the twins is off quite a bit.
    www.mscservices.net


    Tuner of many, many Duramax and Cummins Diesels.


  3. #3
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GMC-2002-Dmax View Post
    What is MAF reading currently?

    Adding a second charger and relocating the MAF Sensor is likely the issue.

    Get a MAF Data log of a 100% stock truck, then compare to your logged flow, I bet the flow on the truck with the twins is off quite a bit.
    Pretty sure maf is maxing out, I multiplied by 1.52 based off original sizing to that massive pipe on the front of the charger. I'll check shortly.

    Sent from my 2PS64 using Tapatalk

  4. #4
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GMC-2002-Dmax View Post
    What is MAF reading currently?

    Adding a second charger and relocating the MAF Sensor is likely the issue.

    Get a MAF Data log of a 100% stock truck, then compare to your logged flow, I bet the flow on the truck with the twins is off quite a bit.
    I'm seeing 86.69 lbs/min currently. Previous tune that that was in truck saw 76.29. I rescaled to see 76.29 maxd out and found no difference. I rescaled my boost map a bit with no difference either but a tighter desired vs actual.
    I've noticed this time as I didn't let it warm up, it doesn't seem to fuel cut until above ~158F on coolant temp. Yet all fuel coolant modifiers start going to zero at 140-150.

    I wanna think it's something in the torque fuel tables but with no modifications on those tables from a base file.


    Sent from my 2PS64 using Tapatalk

  5. #5
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    11

    Default

    I obviously have some cleaning up to do on the boost map still. The requested torque should be 897, it's never above 430 on the norm, peaks higher than that, but the mm3 doesn't line up with the torque based fuel tables, modifiers are off at the temp the truck is at as they are all zeros. Even when the desired boost matches the actual at the end of the file, it never changes the requested torque. I'm not sure where the data is being pulled from at this point. If anyone wants to review this data and makes you jump out of your seat at where you would be looking, feel free to let me know
    Attached Files Attached Files

  6. #6
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    29

    Default

    Do you have any DTC's present? Is it showing reduced power on the dash display?
    Your vane % is at 100% almost the entire time. You are hitting a limiter that's probably related to boost/airflow.
    2015 Chevy 2500 DC 4x4 LML Stock w/EPA friendly tuning.
    2008 GMC 2500 CC 4x4 LMM DSP-5, Transgo Jr,Converter Flow Valve, Sun Coast Triple Disc,4'' Exhaust,Lift pump,Edge Evo for the gauges.
    2006 Chevy 2500 CC 4x4 LBZ Built Engine, Built Trans, Goerend R, S475/Stock, 30% over injectors.




    South of the Rio Grande

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    62

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 85c20lb7 View Post
    Don't slaughter me too hard, or do if you please. I've searched to no avail.

    07.5 LMM 12628594 os, dsp5 conversion. 12mm stroker, 100 overs, 68mm vgt in valley, 480 over. Truck has been driven well on purchased tunes without 480 for 5-6 years. Added more air, wanted more duration to compliment that air. A little data logging gave me some limits to work around.

    I modified the duration, and timing of the non dsp slot and slot 4, adjusted pedal position a to 886 in the bigger end and tapered it back, I figured I'd get those bugs worked out first.

    non dsp or dsp 4, truck main injection flow rate does not even come close to calculated flow rate until about 3200rpm. Once I breach 3200 it comes alive. The injector pulse being commanded matches closely to the main injection flow rate.

    I can not seem to record torque data on v7.5. says gm.trqeng_b is not a valid pid when I'm connected the e35b lmm ecm. no torque pids are once connected.
    So I added it in on bbx and used the v2 for what it's for, not worrying about your laptop flying when having to brake hard. Pulled log through explorer, loaded it on the 7.5 scan, won't play back.
    I've read about this somewhere else. I haven't researched it yet, but v2 is all up to date, as is software. So next step, watch the data and worry about that other stuff later.

    So I go on another run, find that the trqeng_b maxes out at 443 ft lbs. this can't be right, I haven't changed any torque based fuel tables, pedal position should be requesting 897 ftlbs, it's main fuel rate is 72mm3, calculated fuel is 95mm3, but pulse time is 931uS which is in between 70-75 @ 180 MPa which pressure was at. Once I reach 31xx-32xx the main rate goes to 105 and calculated is within ~10

    does this on the non dsp and dsp 4. so I know I'm sharing the issue in another table. I have at this point maxed b1117, b1118, b1119, b1186, b1128, b1192, b1152, b1153, b1154, b1155, b1156, b1157, I've modified d5196 in the tcm played with d5197 on every setting.

    obviously I've got to get some data recording figured out, It clearly not going to help much if the v2 trqeng_b is real, so it would track in the wrong parts of the tables. I am not commanding 72 anywhere in the 443 sections.

    I do not see what is requesting the reduction in any multiplier but allows it to go away at 3100-3200 area. Outside of continuing this trend of table by table disabling shit until it cooperates, It's making me nutty. I appreciate all opinions and thoughts.
    At what throttle % are you requesting 897 ftlbs? Looking at the data you sent the highest I see is 505 for a second.

Similar Threads

  1. Torque limiting?
    By Rich Z in forum Gen III V8 Specific
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: June 2nd, 2013, 02:32 PM
  2. Duration limiting, what am I missing?
    By icemanjc1 in forum Cummins 5.9L
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: April 10th, 2012, 06:21 PM
  3. Tuning for circle d 3200 stall
    By 05gmcsierra in forum Gen III V8 Specific
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: July 22nd, 2010, 10:32 AM
  4. LBZ log and fuel limiting
    By killerbee in forum Duramax 06 LLY / 06+ LBZ & LMM
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: August 2nd, 2009, 03:26 AM
  5. Help on A/C TQ limiting table!!
    By 99Silver6.0 in forum Gen III V8 Specific
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: May 18th, 2009, 03:34 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •