Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: A0010 Interpolated or Not?

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    21

    Default A0010 Interpolated or Not?

    Is the A0010 Boost timing table interpolated based on the current MAP reading?
    OR
    Does it use the closest row? Example: MAP=162kPa, then it would use the row for 165kPa.

    PCM: GM LS1B
    OS installed: EFI Live Custom 04110003

  2. #2
    Lifetime Member GMPX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    13,148

    Default

    Maps are always interpolated in these PCM's, they never jump from one axis point to the next.
    I no longer monitor the forum, please either post your question or create a support ticket.

  3. #3
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    21

    Default

    That's what I suspected, however in testing it always seemed like the lookup was off by 1 row.

    Test Data:
    No other retard was pulling timing during this test.
    High octane table set the same as Low Octane table.
    The difference in between each row of my A0010 is 1.4 to 1.5 deg so it seemed like it was off by 1 row.

    MAP (kPa) A0010 Actual Retard Error (Actual - Table)
    123 3.1 4.5 (-1.4)
    147 6.6 7.4 (-0.8)
    155 7.9 8.7 (-0.8)
    164 9.1 10.5 (-1.4)
    177 11.0 12.4 (-1.4)
    189 12.7 14.1 (-1.4)


    I have gone away from using A0010 and ended up just setting the timing in the high octane. This is not ideal since it does not vary based on MAP once it's off the high octane table. This is using a ProCharger so I have a pretty good baseline of where it "should be", but on a cold day it could be higher MAP.

  4. #4
    New Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2020
    Posts
    2

    Default

    Need some help with some tuning a 2013 Dodge Cummins 6.7 GPMX. Any way you can help a friend out? I'll make it worth your time. Call or text me at 719-660-4049. Thank you.

  5. #5
    Lifetime Member GMPX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    13,148

    Default

    I don't tune, I program computers
    Kind of odd on your first post you would be willing to put your phone number on a public forum without even a name, maybe a tuner would be happy to call you.
    I no longer monitor the forum, please either post your question or create a support ticket.

  6. #6
    New Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2020
    Posts
    2

    Default

    Sorry. My name is Aldo. I don

  7. #7
    Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    746

    Default

    I get a bit conflicted with this table as well. Here at altitude I don't quite blow the lid off the high octane table, but I'm damn close on the dually. Both trucks can only muster around 110kpa here in CO. The 1500 peaked at 140 back in MI and, with the present IFRs, managed to barely not blow the lid off the high octane table. It is a bit awkward to have A0010 be defined in different units than the high octane table.
    1998 GMC Sierra K1500 5.7/4L80E, longtubes, 411 w/COS 5, marine cam/intake, Whipple. 91 octane at 6000'.
    1997 GMC Sierra K3500 7.4/4L80E, 411 w/COS 3, Whipple, small cam.
    2004 Corvette Z06 with longtubes.

Similar Threads

  1. COS 3 Guys using the A0010 for timming pulling
    By kbracing96 in forum Forced Induction and Nitrous Oxide (N20)
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: December 24th, 2005, 01:36 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •