Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 20

Thread: gm.trqeng

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    192

    Default gm.trqeng

    99 c5. what are the inputs for torque in a stock tune? what happens if you loose the maf? and how is it with cos3 and (e.g.) a 2bar map?

    (gm.trqeng seems to yield same values as gm.trqtrans. any thoughts on that?)

    edit: this is what im seeing at 200kpa/no maf. (i cant upload scan for some reason.) rising ibpw to redline, dyncylair rising to redline (1.90 max), torque peaking at 3800* with a (quite realistic for max) value around 800 nm, acceleration fluctuating but highest at 5000-6000, calc.power rising to redline with 500 rwhp max (not unrealistic, a bit low). in a stock cofiguration i see max torque at 450 nm (engine rating is 475).

    *140kpa
    Last edited by dian; December 18th, 2022 at 06:24 PM.

  2. #2
    Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    570

    Default

    Ive never tuned a MAF for boost so i have no idea on this one.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    192

    Default

    speaking of dyncylair: its seems overreported by about 40% in the cos3 tune.

    stock car reports 0.71 g at torque peak. 0.721 liters x 1.175 (15 degrees c, 300m, 50%) is 0.846 g, working out to 84% vol. efficiency. cos3 reports 1.71 g at 5500rpm/190kpa*. 0.721 liters x 1.117 (30 degrees c, 300m, 50%) is 0.795 g x 1.9 p.r. = 1.51 g. 1.21 g at 80% efficiency. 1.71/1.21=1.41. it would mean 113% cylinder filling.

    any thoughts on that? if the inputs were known the numbers could be somehow scaled back, i guess.

    *i took this point because the 2bar map is still well within its range.

  4. #4
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,403

    Default

    GM.TRQENG and GM.TRQTRANS should read the same for combined engine/trans PCM.

  5. #5
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,403

    Default

    When MAF fails PCM sets a MAF DTC, sees this and then does SD (VE table) only.

  6. #6
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,403

    Default

    So you need to get both MAF and VE tables corrected.

  7. #7
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,403

    Default

    In COS3 are you MAF-less (i.e. SD, VE only)...? How did you verify this (or not this)...?

    If SD might have to look at temperature correction airmass tables.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    192

    Default

    maf is gone.

    so are you saying the ecu looks at map and iat only to calculate torque/dyncylair? (obviously it understands boost wit cos3.) how does it then happen it thinks they are highest at low rpm/bosst (3800/140kpa)? iat* is the same and i surely do not have the largest v/e numbers in the midrange, they are rising up to redline.. a stock car reports highers tq/cylair around 5000 btw.

    *in both cases maf would be well beyond the 120g/s blending table limit
    Last edited by dian; December 25th, 2022 at 04:43 AM.

  9. #9
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,403

    Default

    ECU first calculates airmass using MAF and/or VE, it then calculates everything else, including fuel mass and ignition advance.

  10. #10
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,403

    Default

    Are you getting a MAF DTC...?

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Question about GM.TRQENG pid
    By carlsonauto in forum 4speed RWD/FWD Transmission Tuning (incl T42)
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: May 22nd, 2012, 03:14 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •