Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: LTFT cells scanned?

  1. #1
    Lifetime Member Bruce Melton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    674

    Default LTFT cells scanned?

    My understanding is that certain LTFT cells are not relavant to tuning correction (WOT, decell, cold etc.) so which ones are we scanning of the 23, can we select, and which should we scan if we can select?

    Thanks,
    Bruce

    2000 C5 Coupe, 6M, Callies/Mahle stroked LS7 (441), Blackwing, Halltech, LS3 intake, 90mm Shaner TB, ported L92 heads, FAST 50# inj, not too much cam, Kooks 1 7/8" headers , 3" catless mid pipes, Z TIs, track suspension, , 3:90 rear, EFI V2, LM-2, etc.
    PowrMax Performance

    100 mm PowrMAF

    LM-2 EFILIve package with TAQ -sLM2 V-2 serial cable> Package deals

  2. #2
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    23

    Default

    With the default install EFI monitors all FT Cells. Each cell is averaged and presented in a neat window broken out by cell. For closed loop tuning I pay most attention to cells 0 -15. EFI does all the work for us. I believe you must have the PC with you during logging to collect this information.. I’m using an even easier approach by not being concerned about what FT Cell I’m in. I use (Maps) and adjust my VE table based strictly on kpa /rpm, the tables are almost 1 to 1.

  3. #3
    Lifetime Member Bruce Melton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    674

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SS-1500
    With the default install EFI monitors all FT Cells. Each cell is averaged and presented in a neat window broken out by cell. For closed loop tuning I pay most attention to cells 0 -15. EFI does all the work for us. I believe you must have the PC with you during logging to collect this information.. I’m using an even easier approach by not being concerned about what FT Cell I’m in. I use (Maps) and adjust my VE table based strictly on kpa /rpm, the tables are almost 1 to 1.
    I use the below but assume I am looking at cells that are averaged with cells I would rather not include. In this MAP I am using Ver 1.8 with laptop and want to move to VE tuning as I assume I have taken IFR down to minimum?
    Is it at this point you start subtracting the +LTFT values from the corresponding VE table value?
    Appreciate your guidance,
    Bruce


    2000 C5 Coupe, 6M, Callies/Mahle stroked LS7 (441), Blackwing, Halltech, LS3 intake, 90mm Shaner TB, ported L92 heads, FAST 50# inj, not too much cam, Kooks 1 7/8" headers , 3" catless mid pipes, Z TIs, track suspension, , 3:90 rear, EFI V2, LM-2, etc.
    PowrMax Performance

    100 mm PowrMAF

    LM-2 EFILIve package with TAQ -sLM2 V-2 serial cable> Package deals

  4. #4
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    23

    Default

    I start by getting all the LTFT's either + or -.
    I scale the IFR table to get most cells to average at or close to 0.
    Mine happened to be all (-).
    I then cleaned the LTFT's.
    Log for 15 - 20 minutes, then select the Display Leaned LTFT Cells.
    This give you an idea what needs work.
    After that it's time to make changes.
    I use MAP's. select LTFT Averages. Sure beats Excel.
    Based on the MAP results, I make changes to the VE Table.
    The MAP and VE table are not exactly 1 to 1 but they're pretty close.
    My LTFT's were (-) I made -2% or -3% changes to the same area in the VE table.
    Clear the LTFT's and start over again.

  5. #5
    Lifetime Member Bruce Melton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    674

    Default

    As you can see my LTFTs are not very "tidy" I am guessing due to the cam. Do you think it is time to attack the VE table?

    2000 C5 Coupe, 6M, Callies/Mahle stroked LS7 (441), Blackwing, Halltech, LS3 intake, 90mm Shaner TB, ported L92 heads, FAST 50# inj, not too much cam, Kooks 1 7/8" headers , 3" catless mid pipes, Z TIs, track suspension, , 3:90 rear, EFI V2, LM-2, etc.
    PowrMax Performance

    100 mm PowrMAF

    LM-2 EFILIve package with TAQ -sLM2 V-2 serial cable> Package deals

  6. #6
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    23

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bruce Melton
    As you can see my LTFTs are not very "tidy" I am guessing due to the cam. Do you think it is time to attack the VE table?
    Start with red/orange cells first, make small changes to get a feel for how it works. When you tweek one cell it could effect the cells on either side of it. Make sure you clear you LTFT's before logging and after making changes to the VE table or you'll get confused with your results. On (+) LTFT's make (+) changes to the VE table. I used 2 and 3 % changes.

Similar Threads

  1. How to select mutliple cells in a row to smooth?? but not all of the cells.
    By 2010 Bumblebee in forum General (Petrol, Gas, Ethanol)
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: April 29th, 2010, 03:34 PM
  2. MAP cells all the same colour????
    By hquick in forum General (Petrol, Gas, Ethanol)
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: October 21st, 2008, 05:02 PM
  3. scanned my trans am. here is what my previous tuner done
    By Aint Skeered in forum Gen III V8 Specific
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: July 11th, 2007, 06:35 AM
  4. LTFT cells question
    By driver456 in forum General (Petrol, Gas, Ethanol)
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: April 16th, 2006, 09:31 PM
  5. Comparing Scanned Data and My bin :D
    By bink in forum General (Petrol, Gas, Ethanol)
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: October 28th, 2005, 09:34 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •