Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18

Thread: What tables will lean a car out?

  1. #1
    Junior Member Stangkiller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    21

    Default What tables will lean a car out?

    I'm working on getting my car at least driveable before doing the auto-tune with the VE table. My car is always pig rich, and i'm running a very low VE table. <low compared to other tunes of similarly modded cars>.

    What other tables will affect my fuel trims? On my last drive, the car threw two codes, both saying Fuel Trim too Rich. After i threw the codes the car drove much better.

    Anyhelp would be greatly appreciated!

    1999 C5. ATI procharger, Alky injection, 228/232, .595/.598 on a 114lsa, 317 heads, Full exhaust no cats.

  2. #2
    Lifetime Member SSpdDmon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    1,558

    Default

    Since you still have fuel trims coming on, you're in closed loop and commanding a stoich (14.63) AFR. In closed loop, the car tries to maintain that using the O2 sensors in the exhaust. The two main tables in closed loop used for fueling are the MAF and VE. If the MAF is still hooked up, that's where the extra fuel is coming from. Either turn your MAF off, tune your VE in speed density first and re-enable the MAF for recalibration....or....put the VE back to stock, leave the MAF stock, and tune with the injector tables.

  3. #3
    Junior Member Stangkiller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    21

    Default

    Thank you for the info.

    Sounds to me like you're saying my MAF table is wrong.

    My understanding is the maf flows what it flows, and is not really a tuning tool. I should have the correct table for my maf, and that should be it as far as correcting the maf goes?

    Thanks!
    Chris
    1999 C5. ATI procharger, Alky injection, 228/232, .595/.598 on a 114lsa, 317 heads, Full exhaust no cats.

  4. #4
    Lifetime Member SSpdDmon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    1,558

    Default

    There are two main theories to tuning that I see on the net. One is what people consider "old-school" and the other is what many try to do. Personally, I think the old school way works best for forced induction cars and it's how most of the pro's tune (ie Lingenfelter). Basically, they leave the VE and MAF tables alone. Then, based on the AFR read in the exhaust with a WBO2, they decrease/increase the injector flow rate table to richen/lean the fueling delivered at various levels of manifold vacuum. WOT fueling is then dialed in with the PE table.

    Many people online consider this old-school way of tuning "jenkity" because you're in essence tricking the PCM into thinking the injectors are bigger or smaller than they really are. Therefore, the PCM alters the amount of time they stay open to fuel the motor. You're also depending heavily on the MAF sensor. In the (rare) case that it fails, your car isn't going anywhere.

    Tuning the other way, people disable their MAF and reverse engineer thier VE table in speed density by observing commanded vs actual AFR's. The benefit of this is - incase of a MAF failure, you can still drive the vehicle without concern for the motor's safety & some argue better transitional throttle fueling. The problem is, it can be a time consuming effort trying to dial it in with variations in conditions from day to day. Once the VE table is dialed in, the MAF is re-enabled and reverse engineered in the same manner. However, some end up increasing the values in the MAF on modified cars so much sometimes that it eats up the limits, or range, in the MAF table (PCM can only account for 512 grams/sec). Next thing you know, your MAF peaks out at 10,750Hz instead of 11,250Hz like it used to (stock '02 f-body MAF table referenced).

    The second method seems to use the PCM's OS the way it was theoretically designed to work. However, the hardware limitations sometimes make it difficult to tune with. If you have the time, patience and can get it to work, more power to you. But, you won't be able to dial in part throttle and WOT tuning in 1 days time using that method.
    Last edited by SSpdDmon; September 11th, 2006 at 08:26 AM.

  5. #5
    Junior Member Stangkiller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    21

    Default

    Thank you very much. My goal is to learn the second tuning method, and actually get the car tuned properly.

    Right now, i'm still trying to get acquainted with EFI-Live, and many of the tuning theory's as well as just trying to make my car driveable.

    I did upgrade my car to the custom OS 3, after adding LQ-9 heads. Today i finally got the car to idle <adding more timing at idle.> But it's still way rich. Thanks for the info, i'm going to try another MAF table, to see if i can't lean it out a bit more.
    1999 C5. ATI procharger, Alky injection, 228/232, .595/.598 on a 114lsa, 317 heads, Full exhaust no cats.

  6. #6
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,403

    Default

    Hi Chris,

    have you seen the AutoVE tutorial...?

    http://www.efilive.com/download.aspx#downloads7

    Also, if you're running too rich, are you sure you have no air leaks...?

    Cheers,
    Joe

  7. #7
    Junior Member Stangkiller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    21

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by joecar
    Hi Chris,

    have you seen the AutoVE tutorial...?

    http://www.efilive.com/download.aspx#downloads7

    Also, if you're running too rich, are you sure you have no air leaks...?

    Cheers,
    Joe
    I've got the car back to driveable now.

    I plan on running the Auto VE shortly. I just got the adaptor for my wideband this weekend. So i'll be doing the auto-tune sometime soon.

    I took a look at my MAF table, i have no clue where it came from or how i accidentally adjusted it. But it was WAY off. I had a stock 02 z06 tune, so I copied that MAF over. The car runs MUCH better. Still rich....But it sounds like i've got a pretty bad exhaust leak, <infront of my O2 sensors> My new exhaust gaskets will be here on Friday.

    When you say Air leaks. You're suggesting maybe my Manifold is leaking? I did just swap heads, so i can't rule that out.
    1999 C5. ATI procharger, Alky injection, 228/232, .595/.598 on a 114lsa, 317 heads, Full exhaust no cats.

  8. #8
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,403

    Default

    Air leak = any leak that introduces air (unaccounted for by MAF and/or VE table) that causes PCM to add more fuel.

    That can be exhaust and/or intake air leaks (because both would cause the O2S to read lean, which would cause the PCM to add fuel, showing up as very postive LTFT's; exhaust leak would cause O2S to read lean due to added oxygen after combustion; intake leak would cause lean combustion; both cases O2S cause PCM to compensate and add fuel).

    So it would be good idea to check from MAF all the way to the O2S, just in case (including PCV plumbing).
    Last edited by joecar; September 11th, 2006 at 09:37 AM.

  9. #9
    Lifetime Member TAQuickness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    2,940

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stangkiller
    Thank you for the info.

    Sounds to me like you're saying my MAF table is wrong.

    My understanding is the maf flows what it flows, and is not really a tuning tool. I should have the correct table for my maf, and that should be it as far as correcting the maf goes?

    Thanks!
    Chris

    Yes and no. Mass air flow is Mass airflow. But keep in mind that the PCM never measures air (mass) flow. All air flow values are calculated or in table form.


  10. #10
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,403

    Default

    Also, the MAF may be sensitive to any changes upsteam (lid, filter, plumbing) and/or downstream (cam reversion, pulse harmonics, intake, heads).

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. can a lean idle or going lean during light cruise harm the engine?
    By ryans1000 in forum General (Petrol, Gas, Ethanol)
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: November 3rd, 2009, 01:44 PM
  2. lean low rpm??!!
    By nathans1987 in forum Custom Operating Systems
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: May 7th, 2009, 03:23 AM
  3. Going lean on top end AFR 19.5 WB !!!!
    By RandyWS6 in forum Gen III V8 Specific
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: June 1st, 2007, 06:41 AM
  4. How lean can I go?
    By dirt_track_racer_81 in forum General (Petrol, Gas, Ethanol)
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: June 18th, 2006, 07:47 PM
  5. Lean on tip in
    By 1bar in forum General (Petrol, Gas, Ethanol)
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: April 8th, 2006, 01:51 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •