Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 20

Thread: AutoVE ?

  1. #1
    Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    551

    Default AutoVE ?

    What causes the coasting portion (25-30 kPa) of the VE table to always be lean according to the BEN Maps. These cells always have the highest cell counts in the Map. You could increase the VE values for these cells to 200% and it would still go lean. (The other lean values in this particular BEN Map are just the result of a smoothing experiment.) DFCO is disabled.
    Does something else cut off fuel?

    2017 Camaro SS, 2014 Ram 2500 4x4 Cummins 6.7L, 2004 Chevy Avalanche Z71 4̶X̶4̶(now 2WD), 5870lb race weight, 10.93@ 124, Twin TVS1900s, Twin Throttle, 429 LSX, 4L80E, custom 14 bolt rear, V2, R̶o̶a̶d̶R̶u̶n̶n̶e̶r̶(dead), COS3......
    Gettin' the Groceries

  2. #2
    EFILive Crew Site Admin Tordne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    3,870

    Default

    What is the Min/Max values for those low cells?
    Andrew
    EFILive Crew


  3. #3
    Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    551

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tordne
    What is the Min/Max values for those low cells?
    About .9/1.2 for the cells in the 25 kPa column. My WBC gauge is usually showing something like 17 AFR under these conditions.
    2017 Camaro SS, 2014 Ram 2500 4x4 Cummins 6.7L, 2004 Chevy Avalanche Z71 4̶X̶4̶(now 2WD), 5870lb race weight, 10.93@ 124, Twin TVS1900s, Twin Throttle, 429 LSX, 4L80E, custom 14 bolt rear, V2, R̶o̶a̶d̶R̶u̶n̶n̶e̶r̶(dead), COS3......
    Gettin' the Groceries

  4. #4
    EFILive Crew Site Admin Tordne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    3,870

    Default

    I see you are running COS3... Are you running Open or Closed Loop fuelling (or Semi-Open Loop)?

    What is the value in the B3647 table?

    I'm just surprised that increasing the VE massively doesn't help . Couple of other thing I'll ask... How many samples do you see in the lean area (is it like a few samples or heaps)? Could it be that your injector pulse width is too narrow to allow fuel flow - what is your min injector pulse width?
    Andrew
    EFILive Crew


  5. #5
    Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    551

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tordne
    I see you are running COS3... Are you running Open or Closed Loop fuelling (or Semi-Open Loop)?

    What is the value in the B3647 table?

    I'm just surprised that increasing the VE massively doesn't help . Couple of other thing I'll ask... How many samples do you see in the lean area (is it like a few samples or heaps)? Could it be that your injector pulse width is too narrow to allow fuel flow - what is your min injector pulse width?
    OL/SD. Well, I actually haven't tried 200%. But I have had this area higher than even the 105 column. Doesn't seem right to me. Heaps of samples in these columns. Min IPW is still stock at .7579 ms but I now have the Mototron 60lb/hr(8.89 g/s) injectors.
    2017 Camaro SS, 2014 Ram 2500 4x4 Cummins 6.7L, 2004 Chevy Avalanche Z71 4̶X̶4̶(now 2WD), 5870lb race weight, 10.93@ 124, Twin TVS1900s, Twin Throttle, 429 LSX, 4L80E, custom 14 bolt rear, V2, R̶o̶a̶d̶R̶u̶n̶n̶e̶r̶(dead), COS3......
    Gettin' the Groceries

  6. #6
    EFILive Crew Site Admin Tordne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    3,870

    Default

    OK... So are you seeing AFR's say 19+ in those areas?

    I'm going to take a stab at your problem, based on my recent experience with some SVO 42lb injectors.

    I think it may be that your injector pulse width is too low, and that the resultant pulse width isn't actually long enough (time wise) to actually allow the injector to open and flow fuel. If this is the case what will end up happening (more than likely) is that you will raise the pulse width till they flow fuel and then you will be pig rich . Basically this will be because the minimum flow of those injectors are likely to be too much for the those areas
    Andrew
    EFILive Crew


  7. #7
    Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    551

    Default

    Here is a snapshot of a typical instance. IBPW does not appear to be at the minimum but is less than the IBPW at idle even though TP is greater at 11% vs 2.75%.

    As you stated, some with 60s on returnless systems have had issues with too much fuel at idle. Fortunately, my conversion to return style allows for a lower FP at idle.

    Coast:


    Idle:


    Here is a typical starting MainVE table that yields this type of BEN results.
    Last edited by DrX; October 15th, 2006 at 06:02 AM.
    2017 Camaro SS, 2014 Ram 2500 4x4 Cummins 6.7L, 2004 Chevy Avalanche Z71 4̶X̶4̶(now 2WD), 5870lb race weight, 10.93@ 124, Twin TVS1900s, Twin Throttle, 429 LSX, 4L80E, custom 14 bolt rear, V2, R̶o̶a̶d̶R̶u̶n̶n̶e̶r̶(dead), COS3......
    Gettin' the Groceries

  8. #8
    EFILive Crew Site Admin Tordne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    3,870

    Default

    Are those injectors plate or pintal style? In you coast shot the IPW is ~1.3ms. I found with the SVO 42's that are pintle style anything below ~1.8ms would see me have no fuel.

    How have you accounted for the differing fuel pressures you mentioned as a result of running the return system?
    Andrew
    EFILive Crew


  9. #9
    Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    551

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tordne
    Are those injectors plate or pintal style? In you coast shot the IPW is ~1.3ms. I found with the SVO 42's that are pintle style anything below ~1.8ms would see me have no fuel.

    How have you accounted for the differing fuel pressures you mentioned as a result of running the return system?
    These are the specifications on these injectors:

    Static Flow Rate: 60 lb/hr @ 43.5PSI (300kPa) = 630cc/hr (sold as 65lb/hr by some vendors)
    Coil Resistance: 12 Ohms / High Impedance / High-Z (No ECM driver modifications required)
    Gain: 0.11ms/mg, Offset: 0.055ms, Turn on time: 1.14ms @ 14VDC, Turn off time: 0.85ms @ 600KPa
    Wide angle spray pattern


    They seem to idle OK in P/N. I have a flat IFR slope although the PCM wants to extrapolate with a slope when I go off the table into boost, so the Boost VE table is compensating for that. Shouldn't my IPW be greater coasting than at idle? Does the PCM determine throttle position during coast(11% in the above example)?

    2017 Camaro SS, 2014 Ram 2500 4x4 Cummins 6.7L, 2004 Chevy Avalanche Z71 4̶X̶4̶(now 2WD), 5870lb race weight, 10.93@ 124, Twin TVS1900s, Twin Throttle, 429 LSX, 4L80E, custom 14 bolt rear, V2, R̶o̶a̶d̶R̶u̶n̶n̶e̶r̶(dead), COS3......
    Gettin' the Groceries

  10. #10
    EFILive Crew Site Admin Tordne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    3,870

    Default

    Do you mean your IFR table is flat in that it has the same number in all cells - like all stock trucks I've seen? If you actually have variable pressure (which you indicate you do) I'd expect your IFR table would need to reflect that (like stock cars).
    Andrew
    EFILive Crew


Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 32
    Last Post: June 24th, 2010, 06:21 AM
  2. AutoVE help please
    By LS1-450 in forum Gen III V8 Specific
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: May 6th, 2009, 09:23 AM
  3. doing autoVE
    By nathans1987 in forum Gen III V8 Specific
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: May 3rd, 2009, 06:20 PM
  4. autove afr
    By 91LS1S10 in forum General (Petrol, Gas, Ethanol)
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: November 14th, 2006, 07:59 AM
  5. AutoVE, What next?
    By dbaxter_ss in forum General (Petrol, Gas, Ethanol)
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: April 11th, 2006, 08:45 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •