Yes, Paul is adding that in for the next release.Originally Posted by Black02SS
Acer, g*k/kpa I think is correct (I'll happily be made a fool of again), if you were in mg*k/kpa then yes were are out.
Cheers,
Ross
Yes, Paul is adding that in for the next release.Originally Posted by Black02SS
Acer, g*k/kpa I think is correct (I'll happily be made a fool of again), if you were in mg*k/kpa then yes were are out.
Cheers,
Ross
I no longer monitor the forum, please either post your question or create a support ticket.
With LS1s , I prefer to switch between g/s or g/cylinder (since it then can be setup to correlate with the timing tables). But i dont mind just changing a number by % errors collected in a chart.
Oztrack
EFILive Tuning Consultant
Worldwide Remote Tuning Service
2006 NSW Super Street Drag Racing Champion
www.oztrack.com.au
Ross,
Double checked everything again & your "raw" numbers are of the correct magnitude if in g*k/kPa . The reason why I was used to seeing numbers 1000 greater within the ECMs table is that GM appear to be working in mg*K/kPa to calculate the injector pulse width from the VE table. Are you intentionally converting the GM table to revised units?
Is the example of the table you provided (see link below) from a standard LS2 or a forced induction car as the values still seem on the high side?
http://forum.efilive.com/attachment....1&d=1164326640
Have sent you another PM with adjusted factor to calculate the correct % VE.
Cheers,
Michael
some newer research done on how to work with GMVE, what does it really mean, how to tune it, etc...
LS2 airflow uncorked?
Natural limits and bad weather
Hi there, has any one done the uncorking process and reported back to you yet with what happened?
regards,
Mike
Originally Posted by redhardsupra
"Just a tune > yeah right !!!! "
yes and no. i have the formula to calculate it, but it returns very noisy signal. basically the temperature model goes out the window because the BIAS table needs to be adjusted, and there's no way i know of to really arrive at the correct numbers in them. you solve the bias table, and we can get the full thing easily. any takers? i hear it's some heat transfer engineering thingy...
i got the BIAS formula from EFI's help files, 273.15+ECT+(ECT-IAT)*BIAS, but i cannot seem to match the scanned manifold temperature to the one calculated with the formula. what am i missing? where does the 'filter' value come into play?