LS2 VE Table values???

[GMPX]

Ross, can you have settings in the tuning tool similar to how we have for LS1's for those that want multiple options? I don't care personally as long as there is something there to change. :lol:

Yes, Paul is adding that in for the next release.
Acer, g*k/kpa I think is correct (I'll happily be made a fool of again), if you were in mg*k/kpa then yes were are out.

Cheers,
Ross

[oztracktuning]

With LS1s , I prefer to switch between g/s or g/cylinder (since it then can be setup to correlate with the timing tables). But i dont mind just changing a number by % errors collected in a chart.

[Acer]

Ross,

Double checked everything again & your "raw" numbers are of the correct magnitude if in g*k/kPa . The reason why I was used to seeing numbers 1000 greater within the ECMs table is that GM appear to be working in mg*K/kPa to calculate the injector pulse width from the VE table. Are you intentionally converting the GM table to revised units?

Is the example of the table you provided (see link below) from a standard LS2 or a forced induction car as the values still seem on the high side?

http://forum.efilive.com/attachment....1&d=1164326640

Have sent you another PM with adjusted factor to calculate the correct % VE.

Cheers,

Michael

[redhardsupra]

some newer research done on how to work with GMVE, what does it really mean, how to tune it, etc...

LS2 airflow uncorked?

Natural limits and bad weather

[The Alchemist]

Hi there, has any one done the uncorking process and reported back to you yet with what happened?

regards,

Mike

some newer research done on how to work with GMVE, what does it really mean, how to tune it, etc...

LS2 airflow uncorked?

Natural limits and bad weather

[redhardsupra]

yes and no. i have the formula to calculate it, but it returns very noisy signal. basically the temperature model goes out the window because the BIAS table needs to be adjusted, and there's no way i know of to really arrive at the correct numbers in them. you solve the bias table, and we can get the full thing easily. any takers? i hear it's some heat transfer engineering thingy...

[redhardsupra]

i got the BIAS formula from EFI's help files, 273.15+ECT+(ECT-IAT)*BIAS, but i cannot seem to match the scanned manifold temperature to the one calculated with the formula. what am i missing? where does the 'filter' value come into play?