Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 28 of 28

Thread: DYNAIRTMP_DMA vs CHRGTEMP_DMA

  1. #21
    Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    1,934

    Default

    Marcin,

    I was a clinician for many years, before retiring from the field. My words were carefully chosen, not in anyway an attack, and based on years of direct experience. Your words cannot hide your underlying mental health issues … get control of yourself and attempt to become a “sociable” member of this Forum … or take a sabbatical until such time as you are able.


    Regards,
    Taz

  2. #22
    Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    702

    Default

    awesome, now i'm a mental case for sharing years of my work with complete strangers for free...
    Taz, you are correct, i will change. from this moment on, i am taking a sabbatical from helping people.

  3. #23
    Senior Member Wolfie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    182

    Default

    oops. now I've done it.... added to the fray...
    I always thought this forum was for the people, by the people, to share ideas?
    If one on this board is here to take in what is written, but offers no offerings....
    as in... "sharing years of my work with complete strangers for free...,
    just why are you here?
    Wolfie
    LS1B 2007 Express 6.0 /w 470,000+ miles (parked as of 01April2011)

  4. #24
    Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    1,762

    Default

    I don't see anything wrong with what redhardsupra has said.. and I find his post EXTREMELY valuable and...FREE... why would anyone want to piss him off is inexplicable.
    "All that is needed for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing..."

  5. #25
    R.I.P Shawn, 1956-2011 WeathermanShawn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,807

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by redhardsupra View Post
    what's the difference between DYNAIRTMP_DMA vs CHRGTEMP_DMA??
    There is no difference. They are the same.

    If readers are interested in further technical discussion of DYNAIRTMP.DMA, it is addressed in this thread:http://forum.efilive.com/showthread....ge-Temperature

    Last edited by WeathermanShawn; March 1st, 2011 at 08:41 AM. Reason: Updated Attachment..
    2002 Black Camaro Z-28 M6 Hardtop 11.0:1CR 425HP/410TQ SAE (400TQ@3500RPM)
    200cc Heads, 228/232 110+2 Cam, 1 3/4" LT's w/catts, GMMG, Koni Shocks, Hotchkis Springs, 35/21 Sways, 17" ZR1's, 3.90 Gears Roadrunner PCM LM-2 Serial Wideband
    EFILive Closed-Loop MAF/SD Hybrid Tune..


  6. #26

    Default

    Wow! This is a crazy thread!!!!

    As a calibrator who has spent years self teaching and mucking through documentation to make my own opinion I have to admit that some things I don't want to share. Not implying to you guys in this thread but many people buy the software...make one post and want the quick answers....I hate that crap. I would rather send info that I guarded through an e mail or PM before I publically dumped it here.

    Obviously when discussing general understandings its not that big a deal...

    Marcin has done a great job over the years in converting math into street level reality. Much appreciated....maybe if you play nice he will crack! LOL!

    Howard

    www.redline-motorsports.net

    1-954-703-5560

    2006 ZO6 895/866 with APS TT
    2010 SSRS Camaro HTR-900TT (798/801)
    2011 HTR-850R Camaro
    2012 ZL1 Auto (10.33@135 MPH) Video Here!

  7. #27
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    27,752

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by redhardsupra View Post
    CALC.VE is horsepoop. ignore at will.
    The CALC.VE pid that comes predefined with the V7 scantool is defined as:

    Code:
    VE%   = {SAE.MAF.gps}*({SAE.IAT.C}+273.15)/((displacement()*61.024)*{SAE.RPM}*{SAE.MAP.kPa})*212544
    VEpcm = {SAE.MAF.gps}*({SAE.IAT.C}+273.15)/((displacement()*61.024)*{SAE.RPM}*{SAE.MAP.kPa})*6155274.24
    I saw several problems with those definitions:
    - they use IAT instead of DAT;
    - the constants don't reconcile (VE% is close, VEpcm is nowhere near).


    Here's my analysis/derivation of calculated VE (I keep track of the constants):

    Code:
    In one cycle (4 strokes, 2 revs) all N cylinders are filled/emptied once.
    
    Time for one cycle (2 revs): 
    t[s] = 2[rev] * 60[s/min] / RPM[rev/min]
         = 120[s*rev/min] / RPM[rev/min]
     
    Mass of air thru engine in one cycle (N cylinders):
    VE[g] = MAF[g/s] * t[s]
          = MAF[g/s] * 120[s*rev/min] / RPM[rev/min]
    
    
    Mass of air normalized for temperature and pressure in one cycle (N cylinders):  
    VE[g*K/kPa] = VE[g] * DAT[K] / MAP[kPa]
                = MAF[g/s] * DAT[K] * 120[s*rev/min] / RPM[rev/min] / MAP[kPa]
    
    Normalized mass of air thru one cylinder: 
    VE[g*K/kPa] = MAF[g/s] * DAT[K] * 120[s*rev/min] / RPM[rev/min] / MAP[kPa] / N
                = MAF[g/s] * DAT[K] * 15[s*rev/min] / RPM[rev/min] / MAP[kPa]    when N=8
     
    
    Ideal Gas Law equation (PV=nRT):
    P[Pa] * V[m^3] = n[mol] * R[J/K/mol] * T[K] = (m[g] / M[g/mol]) * R[J/K/mol] * T[K] 
     
    where: 
        M = 28.96[g/mol] = molar mass of air (average molar mass of air composition)
        R = 8.31447[J/K/mol] = Universal gas Constant
        T = DAT[K]
        P = MAP[Pa]
        V = displacement[m^3] of engine (all N cylinders)
    
    Theoretical air mass contained in engine displacement V (N cylinders), rearrange IGL: 
    m[g] = V[m^3] * MAP[Pa] / DAT[K] * M[g/mol] / R[J/K/mol]
    
    Note conversions: 
        1[Pa] = 1[N/m^2] = 1[J/m^3] since 1[J] = 1[Nm]
        1[kPa] = 1000[Pa]
        1[m^3] = 1000[L]
    
    So, converting to [L] and [kPa], theoretical air mass becomes: 
    m[g] = V[L] * MAP[kPa] / DAT[K] * M[g/mol] / R[J/K/mol] * 1000[Pa/kPa] / 1000[L/m^3] 
         = V[L] * MAP[kPa] / DAT[K] * 28.96[g/mol] / 8.31447[J/K/mol] * 1[Pa/kPa*m^3/L]
         = V[L] * MAP[kPa] / DAT[K] * 3.4831[g*K*/kPa/L]
    
    So, mass volumetric efficiency of engine (N cylinders): 
    VE[%] = VE[g] / m[g] * 100[%]
          = MAF[g/s] * 120[s*rev/min] / RPM[rev/min] / V[L] / MAP[kPa] * DAT[K] / 3.4831[g*K*/kPa/L] * 100[%]
          = MAF[g/s] * DAT[K] * 3445.2[s/g*kPa/K*rev/min*L*%] / RPM[rev/min] / MAP[kPa] / V[L]
    
    Mass volumetric efficiency of 1 cylinder would be:
    VE[%] = (VE[g] / N) / (m[g] / N) * 100[%] = VE[g] / m[g] * 100[%]
          = same as for N cylinders.
    
     i.e. VE[%] is the same regardless of number of cylinders.
     
    
    Writing VE[g*K/kPa] and VE[%] using pids (assuming engine 5.669L V8):
    VE[g*K/kPa] = {SAE.MAF.gps}*{CALC.DAT.K}/{SAE.RPM}/{SAE.MAP.kPa}*15  for 1 of 8 cylinders
    VE[%]       = {SAE.MAF.gps}*{CALC.DAT.K}/(SAE.RPM}/{SAE.MAP.kPa}*3445.2/5.669

    So I would ignore
    the CALC.VE pid (like you said) and instead use the VE derived above.
    Last edited by joecar; April 26th, 2012 at 11:13 AM.

  8. #28
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    27,752

    Default Summary

    For one cylinder in an 8 cylinder motor (regardless of displacement):
    VE[g*K/kPa] = {SAE.MAF.gps}*{CALC.DAT.K}/{SAE.RPM}/{SAE.MAP.kPa}*15


    For a motor having displacement 5.669L (regardless of cylinder count):
    VE[%] = {SAE.MAF.gps}*{CALC.DAT.K}/{SAE.RPM}/{SAE.MAP.kPa}*3445.2/5.669
    Last edited by joecar; January 17th, 2012 at 03:30 PM.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •