Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 16 of 16

Thread: wideband review

  1. #11
    Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    379

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ringram
    Interesting results here http://www.fordmuscle.com/archives/2...tout/index.php

    Tordne will be pleased his PLX has the lowest accuracy rating. While us guys with cheap LC-1's can take heart on our nice readings.
    Innovate also recently upgraded all their units to prevent voltage related failures.
    The LC1 would be more accurate , they get returned to the factory for warranty repair every 4 weeks

    I have a heap of PLX , a LC1 a motec and an autronic meter and I would say the PLX is the most consistant of the cheaper brands , at stoich all mine are out by 0.1 -0.2 AFR but everywhere else they are spot on to the autronic and motec meters.

    When on the dyno I have a plx in the car 90% of the time and the autronic on the dyno and they always match.

  2. #12
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    12

    Default

    So i guess people should do their own tests and references to make sure they know if the WB is out and by how much.

    cheers

  3. #13
    Lifetime Member mr.prick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    3,195

    Default

    PLX = POS
    regarding the lc1 :
    i think most people ground out the analog outs and thats what kills them.
    they`re instructions aren`t the best either.
    Last edited by mr.prick; July 5th, 2007 at 11:01 AM.

  4. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    75

    Default





    Anyone else think the placement is foolish on this?

    I think there would be alot of turbulence created, throwing some sensor off.

    Maybe not tho...any ideas?

  5. #15
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,403

    Default

    The thing to have done is to rotate the position of all sensors by 1, and repeat the test;
    then repeat this rotation/test N times, where N is the number of sensors;
    then compare the results for consistency.

    In a "scientifically" conducted test, you're supposed to take a number of readings,
    then swap positions and take more readings, and then plot the average with error bars... etc.

  6. #16
    Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    254

    Default

    holy thread ressurection but now I am getting back into looking to custom tune the ls3 I'm not installing the 2 lc-1s I have. Both were so unreliable it was untrue. When they worked they were very very accurate. But after the recal issues, the fact it would error 8 randomly I eventually settled with my tune and left it (checked on dyno).

    LC-1 was as said accurate but too unreliable to reuse! Now looking at AEM for the next round of tuning.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. Please Review This Tune.. 99 >>> 02
    By tatasta in forum Gen III V8 Specific
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: May 20th, 2009, 03:44 AM
  2. My First AutoVE Log - Please review
    By jermstyle in forum Gen III V8 Specific
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: January 13th, 2009, 08:49 AM
  3. cant review logs
    By charcold-bowtie in forum General
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: May 26th, 2008, 05:03 AM
  4. 2007 in review
    By Chevy366 in forum Lounge
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: January 1st, 2008, 03:13 PM
  5. Help, would someone please review this?
    By NewV in forum General (Petrol, Gas, Ethanol)
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: January 1st, 2007, 11:19 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •