Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: WOT MAP Values(kPa)

  1. #1
    Guess who's back!!!! Black02SS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,355

    Default WOT MAP Values(kPa)

    I am wondering why i see some guys that are seeing values in the 98-101 range at WOT. I have personally never seen anything over 98 on mine with the average being 96-98. Why the difference and what would cause it?

  2. #2

    Default

    On a couple blower cars I've ended up with numbers reaching 110 in VE. It is possible for an engine to be more than 100% VE, especially power adder cars. The 110 in VE is tuned for an AFR of around 11.5:1 in WOT and again most were turbo cars.

    Aaron.
    Aaron L.
    Conover, NC

  3. #3
    Guess who's back!!!! Black02SS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,355

    Default

    Thanks Aaron, but I am refering to straight N/A cars with no adders.

  4. #4
    EFILive Distributor dfe1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    837

    Default MAP, not VE

    The original question pertained to MAP- manifold absolute pressure-, not VE, which are two entirely different variables. I've also rarely seen MAP numbers at WOT much above 96-98 kPa. I think there are a few valid reasons for this. Depending upon altitude and weather conditions, barometer readings may be substantially less than anticipated. When ambient barometer readings are converted to kPa, you'll find that they may be below 100kPa. In a naturally aspirated engine, max kPa obviously can't be more than ambient barometer (ambient air pressure). The standard reference pressure at sea level is 29.92 inches of mercury, which equates to 101.32 Kpa. That being the case, MAP readings in the 98-100 kPa range are reasonable for an engine operating at or very near sea level. However, it the barometer is only 29.0 to 29.3 inches of Mercury (as it is here in the Atlanta, GA area), the maximum MAP readings-- assuming ABSOLUTELY no pressure losses through the air cleaner, intake tract and throttle body-- will be 98-99 kPa. That translates to realistic readings of 96-98 kPa at WOT. Then you have accuracy and tolerance of the actual MAP sensor to consider.

    To avoid chasing ghosts, simply turn on the ignition and link FlashScan with the engine not running. Then look at MAP readings. (Open the throttle slightly to eliminate the possibility of false pressure readings.) Whatever reading you see will be the absolute maximum you'll ever see with a naturally aspirated engine running at wide open throttle. Most likely, intake system restrictions will reduce max kPa readings by 1 or 2 with the enigne at WOT.

    I have to guess that blackSS02 does not live at sea level.

  5. #5
    Guess who's back!!!! Black02SS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,355

    Default

    Well, the altitude here is about 800 feet. That mixed with the hot air this summer, that puts my DA around the 3200 mark. :(

  6. #6
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,403

    Default

    Air filter restriction may account for 2 kPa (barometric air is trying to rush into manifold but is slowed down by air filter);
    Try taking a WOT MAP reading (engine running) with air filter removed temporarily (only for this experiment).

  7. #7
    EFILive Distributor dfe1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    837

    Default

    We're at 900-950 feet here in the Atlanta area. I just checked ambient barometer on my C5 (MAP with the engine not running) and it toggled back and forth between 98 and 99, so it's probably right at 98.5 kPa. That equates to about 29.1 inches of Mercury, a fairly typical uncorrected barometric reading in this area. If you check local barometer, make sure you get uncorrected numbers. Standard weather station readings are corrected to sea level. Temperatures are essentially irrelevant as they have little or no direct effect on barometer.

Similar Threads

  1. Some PID's values don't fit in the chart...
    By joecar in forum General
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: March 17th, 2008, 05:00 PM
  2. LS2 VE Table values???
    By Acer in forum Gen IV V8 Specific
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: May 12th, 2007, 06:16 AM
  3. How can I reduce BEN Map values by 50%?
    By Chalky in forum General (Petrol, Gas, Ethanol)
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: April 23rd, 2007, 02:05 AM
  4. DESIAC_B values and MAF values keep trimming down. Help!
    By ArKay99 in forum General (Petrol, Gas, Ethanol)
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: September 12th, 2005, 01:54 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •