Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 33

Thread: Filtering Data

  1. #21
    Guess who's back!!!! Black02SS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,355

    Default

    I altered my Base Spark Table in Gear to reflect 39* at those cells and I will be trying it as soon as the wife goes to work... (She doesn't know this yet... shhh)... I see totally where you are coming from now on this. I have two more pics for you guys to see the differences.

    Bink - If the timing in the bast spark table in gear doesn't help the issue, how would/do you suggest to tune the low MAP values? I would think just to use the values for 30kPa and below and leave the 35kPa above without FTC 21. Make sense?
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	ftc2022_807.png 
Views:	203 
Size:	37.2 KB 
ID:	154   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	allftc_781.png 
Views:	214 
Size:	44.1 KB 
ID:	155  

  2. #22
    Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    505

    Default

    I try to hit as many lower MAP cells, as possible, using long sweeping hills and steep hills. Steep hill and minimal TPS (lower gear) seems to work well for low MAP/kPa. I would then use decel data for those I can't hit otherwise - and blend it. My .02.

    Cheers,
    joel

  3. #23
    Guess who's back!!!! Black02SS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,355

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bink
    I try to hit as many lower MAP cells, as possible, using long sweeping hills and steep hills. Steep hill and minimal TPS (lower gear) seems to work well for low MAP/kPa. I would then use decel data for those I can't hit otherwise - and blend it. My .02.

    Cheers,
    joel
    Thanks joel, its flat here. :lol:

  4. #24
    Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    505

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by black02ss
    Quote Originally Posted by bink
    I try to hit as many lower MAP cells, as possible, using long sweeping hills and steep hills. Steep hill and minimal TPS (lower gear) seems to work well for low MAP/kPa. I would then use decel data for those I can't hit otherwise - and blend it. My .02.

    Cheers,
    joel
    Thanks joel, its flat here. :lol:
    Oh, sorry.
    Head towards the hills......I'm in Cincinnati. We have a bunch of them.
    Long and steep. Going down -low kPas. Going up - high kPas.

    My car idles at 1125-1175 rpm and 70-75 kPa - I can't really hit the very low kPa and low rpm cells.

  5. #25
    Lifetime Member TAQuickness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    2,940

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by black02ss

    Thanks joel, its flat here. :lol:
    same here, but the ship channel overpasses are great!

    Quote Originally Posted by bink
    My car idles at 1125-1175 rpm and 70-75 kPa - I can't really hit the very low kPa and low rpm cells.
    I'm almost afraid to ask - but, how much overlap do you have at 0.05?

    Would it not be easier to apply a filter to exclude less than ideal timing?


  6. #26
    Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    505

    Default

    [quote="TAQuickness"]
    Quote Originally Posted by black02ss

    Thanks joel, its flat here. :lol:
    same here, but[quote][quote]
    the ship channel overpasses are great!
    Quote Originally Posted by bink
    My car idles at 1125-1175 rpm and 70-75 kPa - I can't really hit the very low kPa and low rpm cells.
    I'm almost afraid to ask - but, how much overlap do you have at 0.05?

    Would it not be easier to apply a filter to exclude less than ideal timing?

    the ship channel overpasses are great!
    That sounds like an adrenaline rush.

    239, 251 on a 106 lsa. 0.570" lift. Installed straight up (not that it effects overlap). 33* overlap at .050".

    They call it the "Grand Am cam".... I think of it as "The Old Man cam".


    Funny thing is when I put this cam in the "gurus" told me it couldn't be tuned AND it would not make decent HP (they new better than the Great Grand Poobah aka GM). 2-3 years ago conventional internet wisdom, in the States, was - "LS1s don't like a lot of duration..like the SBC does".

    Thanks to NoGo, GMPX gojo/jfPilla, and all the guys on these boards, it does pretty well.

    Cheers,
    joel

  7. #27
    Lifetime Member TAQuickness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    2,940

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bink
    239, 251 on a 106 lsa. 0.570" lift. Installed straight up (not that it effects overlap). 33* overlap at .050".
    I think I just wet my pants. - - Yeah, I did...

    How's low speed driving <30 mph, school zones, parking lots, etc?

    I bet that thing pulls like a mad arse up top.


  8. #28
    Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    505

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TAQuickness
    Quote Originally Posted by bink
    239, 251 on a 106 lsa. 0.570" lift. Installed straight up (not that it effects overlap). 33* overlap at .050".
    I think I just wet my pants. - - Yeah, I did...

    How's low speed driving <30 mph, school zones, parking lots, etc?

    I bet that thing pulls like a mad arse up top.
    It's not a big cam nowdays. Many are running 240-250s at .050" with 0.600s lift - BIG stuff.

    It does very well at lower rpm thanks to my Nick Williams 90mm TB (Sounds like a commercial :lol: ). Low rpm throttle response vastly improved with the TB. I have 4.10s and an M12 (2.97 1st?) which really helps keep it in the 3000, and above, RPM range. I can cruise in 4th, 5th and 6th down to 1500 RPM - it's amazing what can be done with compuerized EFI.

    Above 4000 rpm the cam wakes up - you can feel it kick in. Good fun.

  9. #29
    Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    688

    Default

    For your original problem you can filter "including all data" where FTC not equal to 21. THis will include 20 and 22 if i am understanding your questinon correctly after a few beers
    EFILive - The Single version of the Truth

    Larry - HumpinSS

  10. #30
    Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    505

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dirk Diggler
    For your original problem you can filter "including all data" where FTC not equal to 21. THis will include 20 and 22 if i am understanding your questinon correctly after a few beers
    Thanks man.
    But , I don't want 20 either. Just 22. I double filtered as Paul suggested. Been way too hot around here to do much in the way of scanning/tuning - 99*F this afternoon.

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. AD filtering question?
    By 67SS509 in forum General
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: November 16th, 2009, 03:24 PM
  2. L92 Data log
    By etmotorsports in forum Gen IV V8 Specific
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: January 26th, 2008, 05:04 PM
  3. Filtering DFCO Cells
    By Tordne in forum General
    Replies: 60
    Last Post: June 27th, 2007, 02:18 PM
  4. Tuning without IAT Data
    By DrX in forum General (Petrol, Gas, Ethanol)
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: June 14th, 2006, 01:14 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •