Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 66

Thread: GM to crack down on Aftermarket calibrated vehicles?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    272

    Default GM to crack down on Aftermarket calibrated vehicles?

    I saw this on Corvetteforum. Has anyone heard about this yet or is it BS? According to this, even if you reflash back to stock, they can still detect if the ECM has been modified.

    A GM bulletin will be distributed to Dealers shortly.

    This post is for those who have 100% bone stock Corvettes and want clarity on the tuning issue.

    GM's New Software:

    GM is rolling out a new procedure that can identify when a non-GM calibration has been installed in a vehicle. The new process checks a log to see what calibrations have been added. If the calibration does not have an official GM part number it, it is instantly identified as a tune or other calibration not supported by GM. If the log contains a GM part number the process digs a little deeper to find a series of numbers buried in other modules. This confirms that the part number is not a mask for a non-GM calibration. If the calibration is found to be a NON-GM calibration, as from a tune, GM is advising dealers that the warranty repair on the powertrain will not be honored. The dealership will need to provide proof if a powertrain failure has occurred that the calibrations are GMs before any repair is performed.

    Furthermore, since GM can not determine what the impact of a non-GM calibration effect will have on the entire powertrain. GM will void the remaining powertrain warranty. This means engine, trans, drive shafts and differential will no longer be covered. This process has been tested on different Corvettes and other GM vehicles including Diesel's. The process correctly identifies cars with non-GM calibrations.

    This also addresses those that think re-flashing the ECU before taking it back to the dealer is not detectable…..it is.
    Owners, if you have not installed a tune or engine modification, don’t do it if you value your warranty. The consequences are giving up the 5 yr 100,000 mile powertrain protection. If you have a tune already installed then be upfront if you encounter a problem.

    NOTE: If anybody has had a true problem with a 100% bone stock car under normal driving conditions and needs further assistance feel free to PM me.


    It goes back to the old saying; if you want to play you have to pay......or be willing to at some later date.


    link: http://forums.corvetteforum.com/show....php?t=1979769

  2. #2
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,403

    Default

    It's true...

    but I don't know that they can do this with the LS1/LS2 PCM's since these can't detect reflashes...

    but the later ECM's have builtin mechanisms to detect reflashes.

  3. #3
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    18

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by joecar View Post
    It's true...

    but I don't know that they can do this with the LS1/LS2 PCM's since these can't detect reflashes...

    but the later ECM's have builtin mechanisms to detect reflashes.

    I didnt read this before I started the other thread. They can detect on any vehicle now. and its a bumper to bumper warranty void. like I said on the other thread, just thought I would let others know.

  4. #4
    Lifetime Member Chalky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    617

    Default

    Has something changed recently? Last I knew, GM could NOT detect a reflash of the E38 if the cal was returned to stock.
    2015 Z06 A8

  5. #5
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    18

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Chalky View Post
    Has something changed recently? Last I knew, GM could NOT detect a reflash of the E38 if the cal was returned to stock.
    I'm going to double check. I know we can tell even if it is set to stock if the pcm was flashed with ls edit. I have programed another techs truck, I'm going to change it back to stock and double check with the tech 2. I've already had a guy do a service update and put his truck back to stock twice. I'll keep you updated on my progress. It will be monday though because we are going to the track today.

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    83

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CWR View Post
    I didnt read this before I started the other thread. They can detect on any vehicle now. and its a bumper to bumper warranty void. like I said on the other thread, just thought I would let others know.
    Good lord where do people get this crap? bumper to bumper void? Do have ANY idea how illegal that would be? It's misinformation like this that needs to stop, seriously between that and what people THINK certain ECM's store and go posting about it is whats really driving people nuts LOL
    Chris White
    www.GTOShiftLight.com
    2006 Spice Red A4 GTO
    2009 3LZ Z06
    2012 Jeep SRT8
    2013 SRX Premium
    2013 XTS Platinum

  7. #7
    Lifetime Member Chuck CoW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    471

    Default I agree with GTP....

    Quote Originally Posted by GTPprix View Post
    Good lord where do people get this crap? bumper to bumper void? Do have ANY idea how illegal that would be? It's misinformation like this that needs to stop, seriously between that and what people THINK certain ECM's store and go posting about it is whats really driving people nuts LOL

    I agree with GTP. I for one am kinda sick of the "old womens gossip club" perpetuating nonsense and misinformation about topics for which persons have ABSOLUTELY NO PERSONAL FIRST HAND INFORMATION ABOUT being posted publicly.

    In other words....If you do not absolutely have credible first hand knowledge on said topic...PLEASE refrain from making public statements about such topics.

    We all saw the "gm locks computers" and the "GM can tell if you re-flash your corvette after you put it back to stock" rumors on the Corvette Forum and elsewhere.

    You can't imaging how often I have to waste my time explaining to potential customers that these rumors are only "RUMORS" and that it's not true despite the fact that they "heard it on the forum so it must be true".

    PLEASE people...a good rule to live your life by....

    DON'T OPEN YOUR MOUTH if you're not 100% sure what you are saying is 100% true.

    100% of us would appreciate it.
    Chuck CoW
    CoW BOOSTER! Electronic Throttle Enhancement.

    - CLICK HERE NOW FOR MORE INFORMATION! -

    VARARAM, EDELBROCK, AMERICAN RACING HEADERS, BAER BRAKES, BORLA, EFI Live, Magnuson,
    COMP Cams, PROCHARGER, PRO TORQUE, PHADT Racing, INNOVATORS WEST, and more.



  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    169

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gmtech16450yz View Post
    Ok, thought I’d chime in with a little info that might help…
    First off I believe the “*” or asterisk that was mentioned is what comes up in TIS when the calibration “is not recognized by this release of TIS”. This does not necessarily mean it’s a not-GM calibration, it just means TIS does not recognize it. I’ve seen plenty of factory calibrations that TIS does not recognize or have in the database. I just did an exchange cluster yesterday that had two unrecognized calibrations with *’s next to the numbers. This cluster came straight from the factory authorized repair facility. *’s next to the calibration number does NOT necessarily mean it’s a non-GM calibration.
    The TSB I think people keep referring to is 08-06-04-033. It tells you how to check for non-GM calibrations. It does NOT say anything about voiding the bumper-to-bumper warranty. Here’s what it says…
    If a suspicious hard part failure is observed in the engine, transmission, transfer case or driveline, perform the calibration verification described to determine if a non-GM issued engine calibration is installed. Non-GM issued engine calibrations subject driveline components to stresses different from the calibrations that these components were validated to. Repairs to engine, transmission, transfer case and/or other driveline components where a non-GM engine calibration has been verified are not covered under the terms of the New Vehicle Warranty.


    There is a newer bulletin, number PIP4558 (preliminary info, not a TSB) that refers to piston damage in ’07 and ’08 trucks and SUV’s with gas V8’s. Here’s what it says…
    If a hole is found, perform the following steps:

    1. Inspect the vehicle for aftermarket components, such as an exhaust or air intake system.
    2. Document the ECM calibration numbers and related CVNs as outlined in the latest version of 08-06-04-033.
    3. Call Brand Quality Manager, (deleted name and number) to review further direction. He may request photos of the damage or ask you to mail the damaged components to him for inspection.

    Here’s my personal opinion on the piston damage PI in particular. I believe there are two things going on that may end up in piston damage.
    First is most definitely aftermarket tuning. I am thrilled that we have these tools to manipulate the powertrain systems in these vehicles, but in the wrong hands these tools can do a lot of damage. You REALLY need to know what you’re doing if you’re going to try to change things like fuel and spark. I know there are people out there with these tuning tools that ARE causing damage with their settings and GM should not have to pay for that damage. There are warnings about modifying factory calibrations in both of the major tuning programs that should be taken seriously. I’m glad we have the tools, but any tool can do damage if used improperly.
    Second possibility I would put directly on GM. I’ve scanned plenty of ‘07 and ’08 Gen 4 V8’s and I’ve noticed one thing, customers almost always run cheap gas and it shows in TONS of knock retard under all driving conditions. I think GM made a mistake telling people that all these engines are fine to run on 87 octane gas. Most of the V8’s have around 10.5 compression ratio and some V6’s are into the 11’s. I know fuel and timing control can allow that kind of compression, but if it can’t control detonation things can go bad really quickly. I believe GM should have put a “Premium Fuel Recommended” tag on all these motors. I tell every customer that asks, or people I know that have late model GM vehicles to run premium fuel always. In the 6.2 especially, you can hear them ping, which is telling me factory calibrations are not controlling timing well enough to handle the low octane fuel people are using.
    I don’t know if the piston damage that GM is seeing is from cheap gas (especially in California), or aftermarket tuning. From the looks of the pictures in the PI, I’m thinking it’s more likely aftermarket tuning. (Pretty extreme damage.) Be careful with those tunes!

    (Tried to post the pics from the PI directly from the GM site, didn't think it would work! I'll put them on my site and put a link to them later if I get a chance.)
    GMTech go do your Emerging Issues for last month (1/09) and then review your post!
    I am not saying your info in wrong.



    Quote Originally Posted by Chuck CoW View Post
    I agree with GTP. I for one am kinda sick of the "old womens gossip club" perpetuating nonsense and misinformation about topics for which persons have ABSOLUTELY NO PERSONAL FIRST HAND INFORMATION ABOUT being posted publicly.

    In other words....If you do not absolutely have credible first hand knowledge on said topic...PLEASE refrain from making public statements about such topics.

    We all saw the "gm locks computers" and the "GM can tell if you re-flash your corvette after you put it back to stock" rumors on the Corvette Forum and elsewhere.

    You can't imaging how often I have to waste my time explaining to potential customers that these rumors are only "RUMORS" and that it's not true despite the fact that they "heard it on the forum so it must be true".

    PLEASE people...a good rule to live your life by....

    DON'T OPEN YOUR MOUTH if you're not 100% sure what you are saying is 100% true.

    100% of us would appreciate it.
    Chuck CoW
    I know what was said in the Emerging Issues telecast!

    I know what is going to happen when we use the MDI to do diagnostics's
    The MDI is going to check for software updates in models. Can you see how that will effect your warranty? If it auto checks for updates it will check the CVN's correct?

  9. #9
    Lifetime Member mistermike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    363

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GTPprix View Post
    Good lord where do people get this crap? bumper to bumper void? Do have ANY idea how illegal that would be? It's misinformation like this that needs to stop, seriously between that and what people THINK certain ECM's store and go posting about it is whats really driving people nuts LOL
    Damn, I was just putting the finishing touches on my new foil hat.
    World's First Twin Screw Pontiac GTO
    2004 GTO. Blown H/C 408, stage 3 keyboard, billet tires
    2017 Chevy SS with dead hooker is spacious trunk
    2014 Chevy Cruze. MPG queen with my balls in spacious glove compartment.

    www.aussiemotive.com

  10. #10
    Lifetime Member Garry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    649

    Default

    Well, seeing what some "Tuners" program into the cars, this step is understandable ... and with the availability and affordability of the tuning tools, anybody can totally mess up their car ... why should such a person be still covered by waranty?

    But then - on a stock car/motor, tuning of PCM parameters make only limited sense ... (OK, I gained 0.5 w/o any other modifications ...) So the message is: either go all the way, or stay stock ...
    Garry Glendown * '17 Fifty 2SS MT * 99 Firehawk Convertible (for sale)

Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. 99 Saturn crack log
    By sabercatpuck in forum IL4, 97-01 PCM and 02+ P11 PCM
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: February 19th, 2012, 11:57 AM
  2. GM to crack down on Aftermarket calibrated vehicles?
    By DrkPhx in forum General (Petrol, Gas, Ethanol)
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: March 28th, 2008, 03:15 PM
  3. Finally got my first crack at BBL
    By TAQuickness in forum FlashScan V2 BB Logging
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: December 9th, 2007, 12:22 PM
  4. Aftermarket tach problems
    By tannerman in forum General (Petrol, Gas, Ethanol)
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: November 9th, 2007, 03:18 PM
  5. Aftermarket MAF's and tuning..
    By Redline Motorsports in forum General (Petrol, Gas, Ethanol)
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: March 18th, 2006, 02:06 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •