Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: DFCO with ECT

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    34

    Default DFCO with ECT

    When I look at the SS logs supplied with EFILIVE, idle is at 0% throttle. So when you lift off the throttle it will drop below the 2% or so required and if everything else is in order we get DFCO.
    When I log SAE.TP ( throttle position ) on my ECT equiped VZ it never goes below 6.3% at idle, but the DFCO enable level is set at the same level (around 2% ).
    Does this mean that ECT cars don't have DFCO? or
    Am I logging the wrong PID?
    Thanks, Steve
    Just got off the showroom floor, now lets fix it.

  2. #2
    Lifetime Member SSpdDmon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    1,558

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by vzsv8 View Post
    When I look at the SS logs supplied with EFILIVE, idle is at 0% throttle. So when you lift off the throttle it will drop below the 2% or so required and if everything else is in order we get DFCO.
    When I log SAE.TP ( throttle position ) on my ECT equiped VZ it never goes below 6.3% at idle, but the DFCO enable level is set at the same level (around 2% ).
    Does this mean that ECT cars don't have DFCO? or
    Am I logging the wrong PID?
    Thanks, Steve
    I think it refers to absolute TP%. What the PCM commands the *ETC* motor to do in terms of maintaining idle isn't referenced for the spark, DFCO, etc. tables.

  3. #3
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    34

    Default

    Correct, I have looked at the logs more carefully and the injector pulse widths do go below idle level. For example:
    Idle
    Pulse With: 2.976ms
    Just got off the showroom floor, now lets fix it.

  4. #4
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    34

    Default

    Correct, I have looked at the logs more carefully and the injector pulse widths do go below idle level. For example:

    Idle: Deceleration:
    Pulse With: 2.976ms Pulse width: 1.587ms
    Throttle: 5.1% Throttle: 7.1%

    The only conclusion is that the idle position is subtracted from the throttle position during deceleration before DFCO calculations are made. The only problem is that there is a 2% difference between my hot idle percentage and my 'foot off' DFCO position. Back to the logging I guess. I hate a unsolved problem.
    BTW Thank you EFILIVE for black box logging on V2, an SD card is much smaller than my laptop.
    Cheers, Steve
    Just got off the showroom floor, now lets fix it.

  5. #5
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    19

    Default

    Any more ideas on this....I'm logging absolute throttle position on a 2004 GMC Sierra 5.3L with ECT, and am never seeing TP% go below 6.5 or so. It's 10 or better at idle. Default DFCO throttle enable settings are from below 1% to 7%, so it'll never turn on by default. Tried raising to 15% did see a *tiny* bit but need to raise the MAP enable levels for it to work.

    Very new to tuning, thought the TP% PID was supposed to read 0%-100% based on pedal position....looked at a log of a 99 Camaro and it does exactly that.

  6. #6
    Lifetime Member samh_08's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    299

    Default

    Log accelerator pedal position instead for ETC

Similar Threads

  1. dfco
    By VUR8Maloo in forum Gen III V8 Specific
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: June 30th, 2009, 12:40 AM
  2. DFCO with A4
    By aleco99 in forum Tuning For Economy
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: November 10th, 2007, 11:37 AM
  3. Dfco
    By purrvert in forum Custom Operating Systems
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: May 27th, 2007, 02:43 AM
  4. DFCO optimizing
    By oztracktuning in forum Gen IV V8 Specific
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: April 9th, 2007, 12:35 PM
  5. DFCO vs ETC TP?
    By DrX in forum General (Petrol, Gas, Ethanol)
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: December 26th, 2006, 11:11 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •