Make sure you have LONGFT1 & LONGFT2 selected along with LTFTBEN.
Obviously you have to have operating narrowbands (NB'S) for it to log...
Make sure you have LONGFT1 & LONGFT2 selected along with LTFTBEN.
Obviously you have to have operating narrowbands (NB'S) for it to log..
haha. I have all 3 selected, the front NB's are still there the rear are deleted. It's logging the HO2S11, SELBEN just fine. LTFTBEN shows 1.000 and doesn't change.Originally Posted by WeathermanShawn
Make sure you have LONGFT1 & LONGFT2 selected along with LTFTBEN.
Obviously you have to have operating narrowbands (NB'S) for it to log..
So my wideband says lean, efilive says fat. B3601 is commanded 14.63.
I read the thread about matching them. What file do I need to add this code into to make sure it all matches. I got it out of the other thread. {EXT.AD}*2.9932+7.315
This snow sucks just 2.5 more months left of it. Damn car gassed me out of my garage before I could get the temps up really good even with both garage doors open and the 35 degrees with gusting winds.
LTFTBENS probably are never exactly zero...
Post up your Tune & Log. I would be curious to see what your LONGFT1 & LONGFT2 are.
As far as your other questions..I'm not sure what you are asking. In CALC.VET all you are doing is taking your filtered data..and apply the SELBEN Map to Table B5001 in your Tune.
If your Commanded is not meeting actual..I would have to see your Log & Tune. You have to make sure you are indeed closed-loop, etc..too many factors to guess..
Frozen,
Are you using analog wideband connection...?
If so, is if your wideband is a stock-programmed LC-1...?
If so, then in Shawn's calc_pids.txt file you need to replace {EXT.WO2LAM1} with {CALC.AFR_LC11}/14.7
Code:*CLC-00-110 factor 0.5 1.5 .4 "{GM.EQIVRATIO} * {EXT.WO2LAM1}"
Fwiw
Well me worthless 2 cents is this....
Marcin you disseminated the ECM calcs and proved the interpolation and crucial need to represent the actual value of those variables....
I appreciate the hellish amount of tedious methodical analysis, theory, and the establishment of FACTUAL DATA AND CONTROL LOGIC...
Shawn-----> Thanks for chomping at the bit;i.e. being the piece of sand in Marcins shell which help turn his honest to goodness proof of specific concept.Whith the help of Mr prick...delco...joecar... all the HARDCORE beta testers and tuners know how and feed back. To finally achieve something that only has a few post by Marcin; Essential his I IMPORTANT stamp of lack of disapproval!
You guys are the BEST!
Thanks redhardsupra for being such a analytical nitpicker Propelling The layman who we all LOVE for sticking to his slightest fudge factor...
THANKS Weatherman FOR PRESERVING uphill to here
;-)
yEAH I AM STOKED!
THANKS
THANKS SO MUCH ALL YOU GUYS ARE PARAMOUNT!
EDWARD SPITZER
;-) redhardsupra's reply of I told you so; SO LONg AGO!
Means Weatherman ACHIVED HIS GOAL of helping layman apply worthwhile logic instead of just fudging...
Damn I need a new battery mines dead.
UGH
Thanks Ed. That was a fairly humorous but quite accurate description of events.
We will just continue to work to make the application even easier.
Thanks for the comments..I had a good chuckle in how you described it all...
wow, its been a long winter. I am going to have to give this a try. I loved the original calc ve. I will be upgrading to a 2002 os this spring and maybe a cos for the spray.
If you liked the CALC.VE, you'll really love the CALC.VET. Just as easy and Idle to Redline Tuning in just one log session.
If you need help when you do it, lets us know..
I will let you know when I do it. I have to get the 98/02 pcm swap done then we can give it a try. I know with the 98 computer there were some different things that wouldnt allow calc ve like your tutorial. (one of the reasons for the switch) It will be a few weeks. Its still winter here.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote