Results 1 to 10 of 258

Thread: using 14.047 for desired AFR and not 14.63?

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #10
    Lifetime Member SSpdDmon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    1,558

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SSpdDmon View Post
    Personally, I use an LM1. In the Innovate software, you can customize the analog output to read whatever you'd like. When you program it, you can do so using Lambda or AFR numbers. Straight from the instructions, it says this doesn't change anything - just the representation of the data. So...from there you need to decide what you want to work with. Then, you can program the sensor and set your PIDs.

    If you want to work with AFR, you could program the following:
    GAS=14.64.....0v=10.84.....5v=17.22....."({EXT.AD1 }*1.276)+10.84"
    E10=14.07.....0v=10.42.....5v=16.55....."({EXT.AD1 }*1.226)+10.42"
    E85=9.77.....0v=7.24.....5v=11.49....."({EXT.AD1}* 0.851)+7.24"

    (All of the above are 0v=1.35 EQ and 5v=.85 EQ)

    The equations are easy. The EXT.AD1 multiplier is simply the difference between your 5v and 0v values (5v-0v=difference) divided by the voltage spread (5v). So, for gas it was (17.22-10.84)/5=1.276. Then, you just add the 0v number on the end (outside of the brackets).

    For logging EQ PIDs using those same AFR's (which translate into Lambdas of 0v=0.74074 & 5v=1.1765), the equation is a little more difficult. This is because EQ & Lambda aren't linear. A little Excel work and I came up with this equation:

    EQ___0.0___2.0___"(-0.0008*({EXT.AD1}+1)*({EXT.AD1}+1)*({EXT.AD1}+1))+ (0.0179*({EXT.AD1}+1)*({EXT.AD1}+1))-(0.1895*({EXT.AD1}+1))+1.5223"

    Someone will have to test that puppy out and see if it's right...and it's not going to be me this week (too much going on). Ideally, using those lambda numbers along with this PID equation, you should be able to disregard the AFR readout on the screen of the sensor. This means that, if I've done my math correctly, it won't matter what fuel is in the tank. If the sensor reads the mixture in terms of Lambda/EQ, this equation should back into the voltage output to provide you a stoich reading. In this case when EXT.AD1=2.975, you should be at stoich no matter what fuel type. When EXT.AD1=1.658, you should be at 1.13 EQ regardless of fuel type. And so on...
    OK...so I lied. I made the custom PID & tested the formula using an old log I had AND.....drum roll please......it works.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	test.JPG 
Views:	263 
Size:	46.1 KB 
ID:	6160  
    Last edited by SSpdDmon; September 9th, 2009 at 10:08 AM.

Similar Threads

  1. B0720-FRP: actual or desired?
    By killerbee in forum Duramax 06 LLY / 06+ LBZ & LMM
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: November 11th, 2009, 05:55 AM
  2. Desired Airflow Map, not quite right, help
    By kwhiteside in forum Gen III V8 Specific
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: September 8th, 2009, 07:14 AM
  3. Desired Shift Time
    By A6sportsracer in forum 6 speed/8 speed RWD/FWD Transmission Tuning (incl T43, T76, T87)
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: June 27th, 2009, 11:45 AM
  4. How does desired boost work?
    By pistonrings in forum Duramax LLY
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: May 30th, 2009, 04:47 AM
  5. Desired Airflow
    By Thumper in forum Gen III V8 Specific
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: April 23rd, 2008, 02:23 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •