Is it okay to use WO2BEN to correct the MAF table instead of LTFTBEN? The reason I'm asking is because the LTFT table has relatively low resolution vs. RPM and MAP, just 12 cells if I counted correctly. So the trim value might be over or under trimming within that cell. The LTFT cells can cover a wide range of RPM and MAP, and as a result a wide range of MAFFREQ. Yes? Perhaps WO2BEN would be a better correction? I'm focusing here on dialing in CL where the AFR should be stoich. SELBEN always uses LTFTBEN unless in PE.
Also, I have an AEM wideband which I believe uses an AFR of 14.63975 for lambda=1, according to their table. This is the AFR I'm using to calculate WO2BEN. I set B3601 to 14.63975 but the wideband is averaging 14.70 during cruise. Perhaps this is in the noise? Or should I leave B3601 to the stock value of 14.681?
Reply With Quote