Quote Originally Posted by ecir45 View Post
Would there be any benefit from running Calc.MAFT after using Calc.VET or is Calc.VET good enough at getting the VE table right. The only advantage possibly I can see is by using Calc.MAFT you could see how far you are off in the VE table in % instead of a calculation.

Thinking out the box since I have only done one Calc.VET so far and think my MAF is spot on but think VE Table probably needs some refining.
Post some log files.