Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 19 of 19

Thread: E38 Cranking Issues

  1. #11
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,403

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mirage View Post
    Hmm.. No I didn't I adjusted for the fuel changes using the VE tables. Here is my B4001 table as it sits today:

    Attachment 12740
    Do you have the reference hose connected between the FPR and the manifold...?

    If yes, then that IFR will give you wrong fueling and the VE won't be able to compensate IMO.

    The 400 kPa value (or closest) should be used in all cells.

    The reason is that the manifold reference adds MAP to the rail pressure, this keeps the pressure across each injector (top-to-bottom) constant regardless of MAP (you will need a 2 or 3 bar MAP sensor if you're boosting)... (MAP on top is cancelled out by MAP on bottom of injector).
    Last edited by joecar; March 5th, 2012 at 04:43 AM.

  2. #12
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    40

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by joecar View Post
    Do you have the reference hose connected between the FPR and the manifold...?

    If yes, then that IFR will give you wrong fueling and the VE won't be able to compensate IMO.

    The 400 kPa value (or closest) should be used in all cells.

    The reason is that the manifold reference adds MAP to the rail pressure, this keeps the pressure across each injector (top-to-bottom) constant regardless of MAP (you will need a 2 or 3 bar MAP sensor if you're boosting)... (MAP on top is cancelled out by MAP on bottom of injector).
    The fuel system is setup with a -10an line coming from the tank to a Y-block with -8an lines going to each rail. Then from the rails they feed into the FPR which is referenced from a vacuum line. Based on your assessment it would indicate that I need to adjust the cells in B4001 to 400 kpa (or close to it). I think this is going to really mess with my current VE, but I'm willing to give it a shot if it is the correct way to do it.

  3. #13
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    40

    Default

    Here is what I tried today:

    First changed the hot cells as indicated by Swingtan. This appeared to help, but when the ECT's reached 90C I began to have the same issues. So I attempted to change the cranking AFR's back to stock levels and the car started great when cold, but at 90C it would no longer start. I had to depress the gas while cranking to get it to start.

    Here are the hot cells changed:
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	b1832.png 
Views:	270 
Size:	145.8 KB 
ID:	12747

    Here is the STOCK Camaro cranking commanded fuel table that I used. After this I could not start the car when ECT's were 90C or above.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	B0138-Stock.png 
Views:	228 
Size:	184.7 KB 
ID:	12749

    I changed back to these values and the car will start again, but has issues when ECT's are at 90C or above. Starts but turns over several times first. It will start faster if I depress the gas slightly, but obviously don't want to do this.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	B0138-Rich.png 
Views:	264 
Size:	186.9 KB 
ID:	12748


    Based on these observations I would think this is fuel related, but what do I change from here?


    Also, Joecar I changed my IFB table to reflect the contents at 400 kpa. (around 9). Still testing how far off my VE are, but it did not affect the cranking issues.

  4. #14
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,403

    Default

    Hmmm.... you might want to check the rail pressure.

  5. #15
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    40

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by joecar View Post
    Hmmm.... you might want to check the rail pressure.
    Since it is externally adjustable I may go ahead and increase it just to see if it makes a difference. I didn't like where the shop had placed it anyway because I thought it was fairly low pressure wise. I'll make some adjustments tomorrow and let you guys know what happens. If anyone has any other suggestions I'm certainly open.

    Thanks for the help guys...

  6. #16
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,403

    Default

    It should be 58 psi.

  7. #17
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    40

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by joecar View Post
    It should be 58 psi.
    Fuel pressure is now a solid 58 PSI. It does crank better when ECT's are 90C, but still turns over multiple times before firing. Is it possible that the CPU is still thinking it is controlling the pressure and thus not running the pumps as much when the car is hot? The pump control is still handled by the computer based on where the shop wired the fuel pumps. I'm wondering if the rails are not pressurizing enough when the vehicle is hot. I'll need to get someone to help with monitoring in order to verify.

  8. #18
    Member Laychut's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    78

    Default

    Hi Mirage,
    I had a similar issue, but mine was fixed by fitting a check valve after the pump. It must have been draining back a little.

    Cheers,
    Laychut
    Going places no one else dares to Go!
    60 Series Landcruiser, GenIII LS1 5.7, 4L60E Trans, 4" Stainless Snorkel
    4" Lift, 35 x 12.5 BF Goodrich Mud Terrains

  9. #19
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    40

    Default

    Finally got it fixed! So to help the rest of the community here is what ultimately fixed the problem. Joecar was real close basically my injector flow base was incorrect for the type of fuel system I was using. After making changes to the IFB and re-adjusting my VE and MAF I was able to bring the fueling quickly under control. Then I noticed that the hot start at ECT 90C was even worse than before. (ie the car was turning over numerous times before starting). Figuring this was a result of the fuel pressure changes and the IFB I decided to lean the cranking commanded fuel table at 90C. This resulted in a slightly quicker start. I continued adjusting until the car started with one turn just like a stock vehicle. For those of you using vacumm referenced external fuel pressure regulators, make sure you adjust your IFB to a flat line at whatever value you have at 400 kpa as Joecar indicated earlier in the thread. The car runs much smoother now and doesn't hunt during idle like it was doing prior to these changes. Thanks again for all the help guys especially Joecar and Swingtan you guys are great!

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. E38 Throttle command cranking?
    By DVR IMP in forum E37, E38 & E67 PFI ECM's
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: December 2nd, 2011, 05:14 AM
  2. e38 cranking help
    By ringram in forum E37, E38 & E67 PFI ECM's
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: March 20th, 2010, 01:47 AM
  3. 2 bar E38 issues
    By XLR8NSS in forum E37, E38 & E67 PFI ECM's
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: May 1st, 2009, 03:51 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •