Page 47 of 75 FirstFirst ... 37454647484957 ... LastLast
Results 461 to 470 of 741

Thread: Calc.VET: correcting MAF and calculating VE (in single log)

  1. #461
    Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    240

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wheelz View Post
    Close. It is a reflection of the stoich for your fuel. If your tune is set correctly then yes it is a reflection of your commanded AFR, but if your running e85, lambda of 1.0 will be 9.something AFR even if your commanding 14.67in your tune.

    But yes on that the lambda output from the LC-1 is stoich for whatever fuel you are running. It is your job to know the stoich AFR of your fuel and command it appropriately.
    If I am reading between the lines correctly, then the LC-1 wideband (when reading lambda) can tell when the car is running stoich, regardless of fuel/ethanol percentage?
    Lets say I use the LC-1 in a car that has a good tune for gasoline, it will read 1.0 lambda at stoich (14.7). Then I take the LC-1 out and install it in a car that has a good tune for E85, the sensor will read 1.0 lambda at stoich (9.0)?
    2002 Z06
    Vengeance Racing Stage 5, H/C/I/3.90 diff, 575 hp
    2016 Chevy SS M6 (daily driver)
    Roto-fab Intake

  2. #462
    Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    289

    Default Calc.VET: correcting MAF and calculating VE (in single log)

    Quote Originally Posted by n8dogg View Post
    If I am reading between the lines correctly, then the LC-1 wideband (when reading lambda) can tell when the car is running stoich, regardless of fuel/ethanol percentage?
    Lets say I use the LC-1 in a car that has a good tune for gasoline, it will read 1.0 lambda at stoich (14.7). Then I take the LC-1 out and install it in a car that has a good tune for E85, the sensor will read 1.0 lambda at stoich (9.0)?
    Yes.
    Last edited by Wheelz; July 5th, 2013 at 02:14 PM.
    14 GMC Sierra
    5.3L CC SB 4x4
    Basic tuning....

  3. #463
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,400

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by n8dogg View Post
    If I am reading between the lines correctly, then the LC-1 wideband (when reading lambda) can tell when the car is running stoich, regardless of fuel/ethanol percentage?
    Lets say I use the LC-1 in a car that has a good tune for gasoline, it will read 1.0 lambda at stoich (14.7). Then I take the LC-1 out and install it in a car that has a good tune for E85, the sensor will read 1.0 lambda at stoich (9.0)?
    Yes, correct.


    You set B3601 to tell the PCM what fuel the engine is running on.

  4. #464
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,400

    Default

    From the other thread, you can see that Lambda is regardless of stoich AFR... i.e. stoich is Lambda 1.00 for any/all fuels.

  5. #465
    Lifetime Member Rich Z's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    291

    Default

    I've got a question about the filter being applied to the map. Specifically this one:
    {EXT.WO2LAM1.lambda} is greater than 1.06 Lambda
    Why are the values over 1.06 being filtered out of the data?

    CorvetteFlorida.com

    2002 Corvette Z06
    427 RHS block built by LME
    STS rear mounted twin turbos
    It nearly died on the operating table, but I'm bringing her back.

  6. #466
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,400

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rich Z View Post
    I've got a question about the filter being applied to the map. Specifically this one:


    Why are the values over 1.06 being filtered out of the data?
    To filter out DFCO (deceleration fuel cut off).

  7. #467
    Lifetime Member Rich Z's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    291

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by joecar View Post
    To filter out DFCO (deceleration fuel cut off).
    Well, I'm seeing some pretty lean figures in my map from my last log, so won't this filter out those cells as well? Since switching to E10 gasoline, it's made some rather lean cells up in the higher RPM cells. If you look at the latest log I have in my "Sanity check" thread, you will likely see what I am talking about. So do I really want that data filtered out?

    BTW, I believe I've got DFCO disabled anyway....

    CorvetteFlorida.com

    2002 Corvette Z06
    427 RHS block built by LME
    STS rear mounted twin turbos
    It nearly died on the operating table, but I'm bringing her back.

  8. #468
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,400

    Default

    Ok, I'll look at it...

  9. #469
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,400

    Default

    Where exactly...?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Log_2013_08_12_0004_0001.png 
Views:	298 
Size:	148.3 KB 
ID:	15658

  10. #470
    Senior Member DocZ28's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    105

    Default

    I have one Question. I´m using V1 and Lc WB and is working great. But If I want to test an AEM 31400 WB, What changes I have to made in calc. pids, I look over the site I can´t find any info.

    Regards

Page 47 of 75 FirstFirst ... 37454647484957 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Please explain table A0007 TPS VE TABLE cos5
    By WHYTRYZ06 in forum General (Petrol, Gas, Ethanol)
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: March 18th, 2008, 06:26 PM
  2. OLFA table vs. Custom OS A0008 table
    By 1bar in forum General (Petrol, Gas, Ethanol)
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: January 6th, 2007, 06:25 AM
  3. Table Names vs Table Number
    By lplott in forum Custom Operating Systems
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: May 17th, 2006, 05:14 AM
  4. Main VE Table ?, Logged data vs VE Table
    By dbaxter_ss in forum Tips and tricks
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: December 26th, 2004, 03:36 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •