Page 62 of 75 FirstFirst ... 1252606162636472 ... LastLast
Results 611 to 620 of 741

Thread: Calc.VET: correcting MAF and calculating VE (in single log)

  1. #611
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,400

    Default

    Fix this:

    Out of Range calibration summary: 04:00:37 am, Friday May 22, 2015

    Engine Calibration.Abuse Management
    {B1207} Abuse Management Vehicle Speed Threshold, was out of range when loaded.

  2. #612
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,400

    Default

    Is your FPR manifold-referenced or un-referenced...?

  3. #613
    Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    259

    Default

    Thanks for the quick response Joecar!

    Quote Originally Posted by joecar View Post
    Post some screenshots.

    On the PIDs tab, do the pids CALC.VET and CALC.VEN have red X thru them...?
    No they don't, see screen capture below:



    Quote Originally Posted by joecar View Post
    Hmmm, CALC.VET data looks wrong... MAF data looks ok.

    Need more data, drive around the block.
    Okay, I'll do that. I did the math on a calculator and couldn't get it to line up either.

    One thing I noticed, the temps dob't look right. The dynamic (DAT) air temps are negative and/or really low. But the IAT sensor looks accurate. Weird.

    Quote Originally Posted by joecar View Post
    Fix this:
    Just did - thank you.

    Quote Originally Posted by joecar View Post
    Is your FPR manifold-referenced or un-referenced...?
    Vacuum in not-referenced. Using a corvette-fuel filter a few feet off the tank with a single line to the rail.
    00 Silverado Z71, LQ9 w/ LS3 heads, BTR cam, Whipple 2.9@8#, 4l80E

  4. #614
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,400

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LastCall View Post
    ...

    One thing I noticed, the temps dob't look right. The dynamic (DAT) air temps are negative and/or really low. But the IAT sensor looks accurate. Weird.

    ...

    Vacuum in not-referenced. Using a corvette-fuel filter a few feet off the tank with a single line to the rail.
    If GM.DYNAIRTMP_DMA pid is returning bad values, then for now use (temporary solution) IAT in place of DAT, and do take a look at how to create the pid CALC.B4901 in the Calc.VET thread.

    Ok, so your FPR has no reference hose going to the manifold (or any source of vacuum and/or boost).



    I see it in your log, your CALC.DAT being wrong is causing bad CALC.VET.

  5. #615
    Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    259

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by joecar View Post
    If GM.DYNAIRTMP_DMA pid is returning bad values, then for now use (temporary solution) IAT in place of DAT, and do take a look at how to create the pid CALC.B4901 in the Calc.VET thread.

    Ok, so your FPR has no reference hose going to the manifold (or any source of vacuum and/or boost).

    I see it in your log, your CALC.DAT being wrong is causing bad CALC.VET.
    I found the calc_pid text file with 4901 and replaced the old calc_pid file. That seems to have fixed the DAT.K temp issues. However, the values still seem really low. Based on the LTFTBEN, I should be multiplying the values by 1.05-1.10 (increase of about 10%). However, on the BEN calculated VE, I should reduce the values by about 25%. See screen capture below:



    00 Silverado Z71, LQ9 w/ LS3 heads, BTR cam, Whipple 2.9@8#, 4l80E

  6. #616
    Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    259

    Default

    Here is the VE table I was reffering to when I was comparing the calculated values in the MAP and the values in the VET table.

    00 Silverado Z71, LQ9 w/ LS3 heads, BTR cam, Whipple 2.9@8#, 4l80E

  7. #617
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,400

    Default

    You haven't applied the transient filter... but I don't think that's the problem.

    How is the MAF table coming out, post a pic of it.

  8. #618
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,400

    Default

    You show two maps:
    1. VET [g*K/kPa] x MAP x RPM,
    2. LTFTBEN [%] x MAP x RPM,

    are you calculating the VE or are you correcting it...?

  9. #619
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,400

    Default

    Is your IFR table correct for the injectors...?

    You said FPR is un-referenced, right...?

    Measure rail pressure (in psi) at idle, and observe pressure as you snap throttle open and then shut... what did rail pressure do...?

  10. #620
    Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    259

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by joecar View Post
    You haven't applied the transient filter... but I don't think that's the problem.

    How is the MAF table coming out, post a pic of it.
    I added in the filters and the changes were minimal.

    Pic of MAF MAP:


    Quote Originally Posted by joecar View Post
    You show two maps:
    1. VET [g*K/kPa] x MAP x RPM,
    2. LTFTBEN [%] x MAP x RPM,

    are you calculating the VE or are you correcting it...?
    I was trying to show that the correction shows to add between 5-10% to the VE table. And the calculated numbers in g*K/kPa suggest to lower the values in the VE table by way more than that, almost 30%.

    Quote Originally Posted by joecar View Post
    Is your IFR table correct for the injectors...?

    You said FPR is un-referenced, right...?

    Measure rail pressure (in psi) at idle, and observe pressure as you snap throttle open and then shut... what did rail pressure do...?
    Injector values are stock and correct.

    Yes, unreferenced. Corvette fuel filter close to tank with no manifold vacuum feed.

    I'll borrow a fuel pressure gauge and try to get a read as you described.
    00 Silverado Z71, LQ9 w/ LS3 heads, BTR cam, Whipple 2.9@8#, 4l80E

Page 62 of 75 FirstFirst ... 1252606162636472 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Please explain table A0007 TPS VE TABLE cos5
    By WHYTRYZ06 in forum General (Petrol, Gas, Ethanol)
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: March 18th, 2008, 06:26 PM
  2. OLFA table vs. Custom OS A0008 table
    By 1bar in forum General (Petrol, Gas, Ethanol)
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: January 6th, 2007, 06:25 AM
  3. Table Names vs Table Number
    By lplott in forum Custom Operating Systems
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: May 17th, 2006, 05:14 AM
  4. Main VE Table ?, Logged data vs VE Table
    By dbaxter_ss in forum Tips and tricks
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: December 26th, 2004, 03:36 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •