Page 67 of 75 FirstFirst ... 17576566676869 ... LastLast
Results 661 to 670 of 741

Thread: Calc.VET: correcting MAF and calculating VE (in single log)

  1. #661
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,400

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tom B. View Post
    I must be missing something. When I copy and paste the calc_pids-2.txt I cannot see the additional pids CALC.LTFT CALC.LTFTBEN CALC.VE_Table. can anyone enlighten me?
    You have to name the file exactly calc_pids.txt

    and download it to the folder C:\Users\xxxxx\Documents\EFILive\V7.5\User Configuration

    the pids defined by this calc_pids.txt are these:
    - CALC.DAT
    - CALC.LTFTBEN
    - CALC.WO2BEN
    - CALC.SELBEN
    - CALC.VEN
    - CALC.VET
    - CALC.MAFN
    - CALC.MAFT

  2. #662
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,400

    Default

    If you download it once you will see calc_pids.txt, if you download it again you will see calc_pids-2.txt... it's what Windows does.

  3. #663
    Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    259

    Default

    You can do what Joe mentioned above, you may need to replace the existing calc_pid text file. Usually Windows will ask if you want to "Copy and Replace" and you should select yes. Usually files from Internet Explorer or Chrome default to the c:temp or a downloads folder. So just make sure it is going to the path Joe posted above.

    Or you can make a copy of the calc pid text file that is posted in this thread - call it something like "Calc_PID for CalVet", and then copy and paste the content (text) into the calc_pid file in the user configuration folder. I have several calc_pids files depending on what I'm doing.

    As long as you get the content into the calc_pid file in the user configuration folder, you should be good.
    00 Silverado Z71, LQ9 w/ LS3 heads, BTR cam, Whipple 2.9@8#, 4l80E

  4. #664
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Posts
    28

    Default

    Thanks Joecar and Lastcall. I copied the files directly to the pids file instead of the user configuration file. I should probably wear my glasses more often.

  5. #665
    Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    259

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tom B. View Post
    Thanks Joecar and Lastcall. I copied the files directly to the pids file instead of the user configuration file. I should probably wear my glasses more often.
    Good deal, glad you got it figured out.
    00 Silverado Z71, LQ9 w/ LS3 heads, BTR cam, Whipple 2.9@8#, 4l80E

  6. #666
    Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    203

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by joecar View Post
    Use g*K/kPa for VE units (in V7 tunetool, go Edit->Properties and set VE units to g*K/kPa)(i.e. avoid using % units, because % units requires displacement).

    Yes, it works for both VE tables (<105 kPa, >105kPa).

    Calc.VET procedure corrects MAF table and calculates a new VE table... neither of these control AFR (or more specifically, neither controls commanded EQR).

    MAF and VE tables determine the calculated airmass... then commanded EQR (AFR) is looked up (either stoich for CL, or from PE table if enabled)... i.e. airmass and commanded EQR are separate.

    Also, avoid AFR for fueling units (it does not consider what fuel you run)... instead use EQR (in V7 tunetool, go Edit->Properties and set fueling units to EQR)(in V7 scantool, log the pid GM.EQIVRATIO... and discard the pid GM.AFR).
    Joe, is there a reason not to use Lambda?

  7. #667
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,400

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SOMhaveit View Post
    Joe, is there a reason not to use Lambda?
    You can use Lambda, just remember that you're doing so

  8. #668
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    61

    Default

    Is this meant to replace autove? Or does this assume the car is close in tune?

  9. #669
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,400

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by steve40 View Post
    Is this meant to replace autove? Or does this assume the car is close in tune?
    No... it replaces AutoMAF (but using both WB and LTFT), and calculates a VE table from it.

  10. #670
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    61

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by joecar View Post
    No... it replaces AutoMAF (but using both WB and LTFT), and calculates a VE table from it.
    maybe the wrong spot for asking, but is there a preferred way to tune a car now. i've been out of a car for years now and just got mine fired up and started with the autove, that's what i used last time. this is for a car that is well, decently far off.

Page 67 of 75 FirstFirst ... 17576566676869 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Please explain table A0007 TPS VE TABLE cos5
    By WHYTRYZ06 in forum General (Petrol, Gas, Ethanol)
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: March 18th, 2008, 06:26 PM
  2. OLFA table vs. Custom OS A0008 table
    By 1bar in forum General (Petrol, Gas, Ethanol)
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: January 6th, 2007, 06:25 AM
  3. Table Names vs Table Number
    By lplott in forum Custom Operating Systems
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: May 17th, 2006, 05:14 AM
  4. Main VE Table ?, Logged data vs VE Table
    By dbaxter_ss in forum Tips and tricks
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: December 26th, 2004, 03:36 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •