thanks. have always been using sae.tp (99 c5) but gm.etctp is consistently lagging by about 0.05 sec (on an average). why use that? (it goes up to 100% vs. 99.6% for sae.tp, but i cant see how that would matter.)
from a log (stock tune): sae.maf 264, gm.maf 237, dyncylair 0.66, rpm 5957. should be 262g/s, so i guess sae.maf is closer. difference usually it not so large. another "extreme" point: 182/166 g/s. during a shift gm.maf seems to go higher (234/266. 9), however.
so what is this, a logging phenomenon, how so? same signal, right? (i was logging at 5 hz.)
Reply With Quote