Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst ... 34567 LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 66

Thread: E38/E67 ECM Speed Density Virtual VE table

  1. #41
    Redline Motorsports
    Guest

    Default

    Here is the calc pid I am using;

    *CLC-00-032
    factor 0.0 2.0 .1 "{CALC.AFR_AUT1.AFR}/{E38.AFRATIO_DMA}"

    Obviously use the WB you are using. Then create a map that has all the required load cells and start logging.....

  2. #42
    Lifetime Member oztracktuning's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    597

    Default

    Thanks Mick & Redline - i got it to work.
    Oztrack
    EFILive Tuning Consultant

    Worldwide Remote Tuning Service

    2006 NSW Super Street Drag Racing Champion

    www.oztrack.com.au


  3. #43

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by edcmat-l1
    Any updates?
    Why are you worried?

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by foff667
    I put together a demo showing just how easy it is to not only get up and running using our RTT system utilizing the stock pcm but also just how easy it is to use the system itself within VCM Suite Scanner.
    Quote Originally Posted by edcmat-l1
    RTT is the shiznit. I dont need no stinkin RR!!!
    You are the one on LS1Tech bashing the RoadRunner...
    Last edited by geoff; October 13th, 2007 at 03:59 PM.
    2002 Chevy Truck

    K&N Air Intake
    Dynatech Headers
    Noisy Lifters

  4. #44
    Redline Motorsports
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by oztracktuning
    Thanks Mick & Redline - i got it to work.
    How's it going??

    Howard

  5. #45
    New Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    3

    Default

    Wow this is awesome that you guys have come up with this virtual VE tables. Right now I am using the other tuning software (you know ) for my E67 ECM in my Ion with the 2.4 LE5 with VVT, now if you can figure out the cam phasing part I am sold and going to get EFI live. This will make tuning for boost a lot easier for people. Right now others are disabling the Dynamic Airflow and tuning solely off of the MAF, its working but it is not the right way to do it.
    Last edited by REDFOCZ; October 14th, 2007 at 02:47 PM.
    2007 Saturn Ion QC3 2.4 Ecotec
    Injen Intake, Cobalt Addiction Header, XTC 2.5 HighFlow Cat, Custom 2.5 Magnaflow Exhaust, Prothane tranny mount insert, Progess lowering springs and Tuning done by me with HP Tuners
    164.04 HP/ 157.92 TQ, Before tuning & while it was 101*

  6. #46
    Lifetime Member GMPX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    13,128

    Default

    With regards to implementing the Cam Phasing part of the equation, it is a little tricky for many reasons as you could imagine.
    During development we had the cam phase calculations factored in but on some applications (the Northstar in particular) the numbers produced VERY odd looking VE tables.
    As an example on the Northstar the exhaust cam at 1400RPM could be anywhere between 24deg or 10deg depending on the airflow figures.
    That is a bit hard to factor in to a calculation that expects one fixed figure, eg 24 deg or 10deg.
    Just when you think there is an easy answer a 'what if' bites you!.
    Only experimentation could prove this, but I think if the cam phase values were not touched everything would still be fine in final calculation.

    Cheers,
    Ross
    I no longer monitor the forum, please either post your question or create a support ticket.

  7. #47
    New Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    3

    Default

    Yeah I can only imagine the wrench that throws into things, all of the new technology is great but it makes it harder for tuning companies to crack it. I will keep an eye out on this topic and see what comes of it.

    Thanks
    Mike D.
    2007 Saturn Ion QC3 2.4 Ecotec
    Injen Intake, Cobalt Addiction Header, XTC 2.5 HighFlow Cat, Custom 2.5 Magnaflow Exhaust, Prothane tranny mount insert, Progess lowering springs and Tuning done by me with HP Tuners
    164.04 HP/ 157.92 TQ, Before tuning & while it was 101*

  8. #48
    Lifetime Member oztracktuning's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    597

    Default

    I used the Virtual VE table yesterday to tune a VE GTS A6 with a 222 224 112 cam. It worked a treat. I had the pids setup for a BEN E38 and a MAP that displayed the BENs with the same axes as usual and it modded the Virtual VE table just like a regular Custom OS LS1 autotune. Its great stuff.
    Oztrack
    EFILive Tuning Consultant

    Worldwide Remote Tuning Service

    2006 NSW Super Street Drag Racing Champion

    www.oztrack.com.au


  9. #49
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    47

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by geoff
    Why are you worried?
    Because I'm an EFIlive user too.

    Quote Originally Posted by geoff
    You are the one on LS1Tech bashing the RoadRunner...
    Man, if you think thats a bash you're a bit touchy.
    Just a FYI, I have a Moates APU. I respect the man greatly for his accomplishments.
    I wasnt bashing anything, that was more a joke, snide comment, whatever you want to call it, but it wasnt a bash.
    PS you cannot find one other comment from me, positive or otherwise concerning the roadrunner.

  10. #50

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by edcmat-l1
    Because I'm an EFIlive user too.


    Man, if you think thats a bash you're a bit touchy.
    Just a FYI, I have a Moates APU. I respect the man greatly for his accomplishments.
    I wasnt bashing anything, that was more a joke, snide comment, whatever you want to call it, but it wasnt a bash.
    PS you cannot find one other comment from me, positive or otherwise concerning the roadrunner.
    Not really touchy, but it just seemed a little hypocritical to me.

    Honestly, you need to really look hard at the RoadRunner compared to the HPT RTT 'solution'. While the stuff from HPT does somewhat get the job done, it is like comparing a Cessna to an SR71. They aren't even remotely even in the same league as far as what their capabilities are. IMHO the only time where the RTT might be 'better' is on something like a Cadillac CTS-V where it is a total bitch to remove the PCM. Also if you leave the HPT RTT OS in your computer you have effectively locked out all other tuning software packages. If you are doing this for a customer they might leave mad if they find out they can't get in their own computer with whatever software they happen to be using if it isn't HPT.

    I guess I am touchy from the aspect that I don't like people taking swipes, jokes, snide comments, or whatever you want to call it, behind someones back while asking them for help.
    2002 Chevy Truck

    K&N Air Intake
    Dynatech Headers
    Noisy Lifters

Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst ... 34567 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Do I need the Speed Density COS?
    By MisterGuru in forum Custom Operating Systems
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: June 4th, 2009, 11:41 AM
  2. Virtual ve table
    By Ls1joe in forum E37, E38 & E67 PFI ECM's
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: May 14th, 2009, 11:31 PM
  3. Speed Density
    By Yortt in forum Gen IV V8 Specific
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: December 1st, 2008, 01:11 PM
  4. Speed density run.
    By nissmo in forum Custom Operating Systems
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: October 30th, 2008, 03:05 PM
  5. Speed density
    By Drake in forum Tutorials
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: February 22nd, 2005, 03:01 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •