Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 31 to 37 of 37

Thread: Rich Idle - Please Help!

  1. #31
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    57

    Default

    Connected the LC-1 to the scanner this week and did a short logging session. Yesss, it worked! My wideband scan shows about .1-.2 lower than the XD-16 gauge. I assume the gauge is correct since it has a digital connection to the LC-1. I'll need to fix that, but the results are still pretty darn close.

    So back to topic... Looks like I'm averaging around 13.5-7 AFR at idle. It seems to bounce all over the place. This was in CLSD so the front O2s/LT headers are probably causing some of my richness. Next step is to turn off the O2s and do my first OLSD AutoVE tune.

    On a side note here's a summary of my WOT readings:

    Code:
    RPM	Commanded	AFR	Error
    3600	10.006452	11.3	13%
    4000	10.006452	11.3	13%
    4400	10.006452	11.6	16%
    4800	9.907182	12.0	21%
    5200	9.822727	12.8	30%
    5600	9.571667	12.9	35%
    6000	9.571667	13.3	39%
    Holy smokes! It leans out like a big dog past 4800 rpm. Shouldn't go any lower than 12.2 or so on the upper RPMS, but I'm seeing 13.3.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	log31_AFR.JPG 
Views:	312 
Size:	121.0 KB 
ID:	3118   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	log31_BEN.JPG 
Views:	245 
Size:	122.3 KB 
ID:	3119  
    Last edited by white01ss; April 25th, 2008 at 04:56 AM. Reason: Fix table
    2001 Camaro SS
    Built 370 LQ9, Ported 243s, D-1SC 14 psi. 691 rwhp, 643 rwtq
    Best time: 11.6@124 on nitto drags with a 2.1 60'
    "if you're gonna build a time machine into a car, why not do it with some style." Dr. Emmett Brown

  2. #32
    Lifetime Member SSpdDmon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    1,558

    Default

    I didn't read through the whole thread - but if you're still having problems with a rich idle due to IPWs not falling below 1.8xx, you can change that by zeroing out B4005 and adjusting B3701 until you get the IPWs where you want them. The reason why these tables work is because the base IPW is determined using a calc'd cyl. airmass and what's 'known' about the injectors (i.e. IFR). B4005 and B3701 are then added on top of that. Keep in mind if you go too low, you'll hear it on decel when the injectors don't fire appropriately - it'll " pop" a bit.

  3. #33
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    57

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SSpdDmon View Post
    ... you can change that by zeroing out B4005 and adjusting B3701 until you get the IPWs where you want them.
    I attempted that already but thought MANVAC and MAP were the same thing so I was tweaking the rows around WOT instead of idle! Now that I know what it means (thanks Joecar!), I will tweak MANVAC rows 70, 75, and 80 and see what happens.

    Quote Originally Posted by SSpdDmon View Post
    The reason why these tables work is because the base IPW is determined using a calc'd cyl. airmass and what's 'known' about the injectors (i.e. IFR). B4005 and B3701 are then added on top of that.
    I was wondering what the relationship of CALC'd IPW and IPWVA, thanks SSpdDmon! I assume that the Min PW is checked as the very last step, so if I set it to 2.5 ms then it would never go lower than that.
    2001 Camaro SS
    Built 370 LQ9, Ported 243s, D-1SC 14 psi. 691 rwhp, 643 rwtq
    Best time: 11.6@124 on nitto drags with a 2.1 60'
    "if you're gonna build a time machine into a car, why not do it with some style." Dr. Emmett Brown

  4. #34
    Lifetime Member SSpdDmon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    1,558

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by white01ss View Post
    I attempted that already but thought MANVAC and MAP were the same thing so I was tweaking the rows around WOT instead of idle! Now that I know what it means (thanks Joecar!), I will tweak MANVAC rows 70, 75, and 80 and see what happens.



    I was wondering what the relationship of CALC'd IPW and IPWVA, thanks SSpdDmon! I assume that the Min PW is checked as the very last step, so if I set it to 2.5 ms then it would never go lower than that.
    I believe you are correct.

  5. #35
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    57

    Default Problem Solved!

    Lowered my O2 Switch Point table by 8% and it fixed the problem. My idle/cruise AFR now averages 14.7. Also updated the IPWVA table by making each column the same value like hquick did which lowered the idle MANVAC range as well. These changes made other parts of the VE table lean and messed with the idle a bit, but I'll deal with them later.

    Also fixed the commanded AFR problem by multiplying the 105 kPa column in the VE table by the BEN factor. Now my WOT AFR doesn't go over 12.0 and is very close to commanded. Again, I'm glad I didn't blow my motor. Thanks for everyone's help, let's go have a
    2001 Camaro SS
    Built 370 LQ9, Ported 243s, D-1SC 14 psi. 691 rwhp, 643 rwtq
    Best time: 11.6@124 on nitto drags with a 2.1 60'
    "if you're gonna build a time machine into a car, why not do it with some style." Dr. Emmett Brown

  6. #36
    Lifetime Member SSpdDmon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    1,558

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by white01ss View Post
    Lowered my O2 Switch Point table by 8% and it fixed the problem. My idle/cruise AFR now averages 14.7. Also updated the IPWVA table by making each column the same value like hquick did which lowered the idle MANVAC range as well. These changes made other parts of the VE table lean and messed with the idle a bit, but I'll deal with them later.

    Also fixed the commanded AFR problem by multiplying the 105 kPa column in the VE table by the BEN factor. Now my WOT AFR doesn't go over 12.0 and is very close to commanded. Again, I'm glad I didn't blow my motor. Thanks for everyone's help, let's go have a
    Please post up a copy of your tune (or email me at SAJ79 at aol dot com). I'm curious to see where your injector values ended up for voltage adjustment, min pulse width, etc.

  7. #37
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    57

    Lightbulb

    Quote Originally Posted by SSpdDmon View Post
    Please post up a copy of your tune (or email me at SAJ79 at aol dot com). I'm curious to see where your injector values ended up for voltage adjustment, min pulse width, etc.
    Sure... I didn't touch the min pulse width table, only the voltage adjustment. I think most of the improvement is due to the o2 switch point table.

    Code:
    	   {B4105} O2 Switch Point 
    	   Stock		  LT Headers
    CL Mode	Bank-1	Bank-2		Bank-1	Bank-2
    0	365	365		340	340
    8	435	435		400	400
    16	435	435		400	400
    24	435	435		400	400
    32	450	450		414	414
    40	500	500		459	459
    48	500	500		459	459
    56	550	550		505	505
    64	550	550		505	505
    Attached Files Attached Files
    2001 Camaro SS
    Built 370 LQ9, Ported 243s, D-1SC 14 psi. 691 rwhp, 643 rwtq
    Best time: 11.6@124 on nitto drags with a 2.1 60'
    "if you're gonna build a time machine into a car, why not do it with some style." Dr. Emmett Brown

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234

Similar Threads

  1. help! rich at idle
    By drdarthinvader in forum Custom Operating Systems
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: December 13th, 2008, 07:00 PM
  2. New cam - rich idle??
    By Tomcat in forum Gen III V8 Specific
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: May 13th, 2008, 08:38 AM
  3. Car Wont Idle And Runs Rich At Idle ( Tune Inside)
    By mikeyayell in forum Gen III V8 Specific
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: January 8th, 2008, 04:17 PM
  4. Idle is rich
    By zapp168 in forum Gen III V8 Specific
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: August 14th, 2007, 10:29 AM
  5. Rich idle
    By gcross in forum Gen III V8 Specific
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: January 10th, 2007, 02:35 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •