no, if education was involved, his science would be better. i'm unsubscribing, some people are beyond help.
Just working with what I've got...
I don't understand how people can be so one sided? Do you honestly believe that increasing a MAF table 20% is more right than decreasing the IFR table? If you want to talk science, I say they're both wrong. I'm not here to argue that and I'm not beyond gone. I just want to see what works, what works consistently, and what can be done to work consistently with a shorter lead time for tuning. That's the supply chain side of me coming out I guess...
Argh!!....I spent all that time reading thru this thread only to find everyone pissed off and stopped discussing this important issue.
great.
Welcome ItzNota...![]()
07 Silverado DMax Classic
02 Z06 LS3 416, 805rwhp, TFS245, Wiseco, Callies Crank/Rods, Iskendarian Lifters, Crower Rockers, FAST102/90, ATI Damper, 1-7/8 Kook's LT, QkTime Shield,Tolle-Fab 8pt
Old Engine: 1/4mile = 9.6/146 New Engine:?
EFI Live Tune/Scan v7.5.27, EFI Live Scan and Tune v8.2.23, build 276, BootBlock 2.07.06, FirmWare 2.07.52, 512K RoadRunner (12.14.R), Innovate Serial LC2x2
COS5/12212156 For 2002 Z06 Manual Vette
maybe you could try to start a new thread instead of littering a sticky-quality thread tho?