As the title suggest, I just want to see if I am on the same track as others on here.
Heres mine
http://www.angermanagementracing.com...rary/A0014.JPG
As the title suggest, I just want to see if I am on the same track as others on here.
Heres mine
http://www.angermanagementracing.com...rary/A0014.JPG
Mine is the total reverse of that one. Using a Over radiator cai - i have about
0.96 at 10deg C
0.98 at 20deg C
1.00 at 30deg C
1.04 at 40deg C
1.08 at 50 deg C
It seems weird but its working!
Mine is same as flyer pretty much. Again, not sure why. Maybe the charge blend table is out of whack and the backwards A00014 fixes it?
Will investigate more in a few weeks when my dart heads and cam are on
Get EFILive in europe (http://www.efilive.eu).
2007 Escalade ESV L92 6.2L VVT.
2014 VF SV LS3 Maloo.
I too change like Flyer does
Yea, I guess i was going the wrong way. My assumtion was that I needed more fuel with lower IAT's. I guess the assumption is right, but the application is wrong.
I know EFILive is coming out with a new OS that will address this after LS2/7 support, are they having it work the opposite way like stated here, or is it going off theory, and not whats seen in the real world?
2000 Corvette Twin Turbo
2004 CTS-V TVS 1900
2006 TBSS TVS 1900
All Tuned by
Rad Tunes by Troy
aka Vetteboy2k
I have been testing with this table a bit lately and this is what I have found works for me:
In another thread Paul (Blacky) posted a spreadsheet that attempted to calculate (I guess with scientific basis) what the values should be. It had many columns to allow you to define at which IAT temp is your 1.0 factor and then scale the rest of the table appropriately. The results seemed to be in contrast what what people (me included) are seeing.
In my previous testing I have found the same results as Flyer and ringram (where the factor increases as the IAT increases).
This last test what I decided to do is reverse the values in the spreadsheet that Paul produced. This seems to be pretty much spot on IMO.
So my table scaled so that an IAT of 30*C is 1.00 looks like:
LABELS IAT VE Multiplier (Multiplier)
IAT °C {link: SAE.IAT} Value
-40 0.911377
-30 0.922607
-20 0.934082
-10 0.946289
0 0.958984
10 0.972168
20 0.985596
30 1.000000
40 1.014892
50 1.030517
60 1.046875
70 1.063965
80 1.081787
90 1.100830
100 1.120849
110 1.141846
120 1.164307
130 1.187988
140 1.213135
Cheers,
Andrew
EFILive Crew
tordne - will you email a copy of that spreadsheet. I get an error when i try to download it
Yes, that is backwards, most have found the hotter the intake temp it leans out, esp at idle, low throttle. I found the charge table didn't seem to help the problem either.......oh, this is running full open loop, no O2 feedback at all.Originally Posted by vetteboy2k
Cheers,
Ross
I no longer monitor the forum, please either post your question or create a support ticket.
My table was very similar
but i have just pasted yours Tordne
Here was my one.
0.979980
0.979980
0.979980
0.979980
0.979980
0.979980
0.979980
0.989990
1.010010
1.030029
1.050049
1.070068
1.090088
1.110107
1.100098
1.100098
1.100098
1.100098
1.100098
Here is the difference between mine and yours
0.068603
0.057373
0.045898
0.033691
0.020996
0.007812
-0.005616
-0.010010
-0.004882
-0.000488
0.003174
0.006103
0.008301
0.009277
-0.020751
-0.041748
-0.064209
-0.087890
-0.113037
I'll be interested to see your results (either way).
I think if I was to start all over again with the Custom OS I might actually find where my IAT is most likely to be at 1.00 and then install the appropriate table to start with. I think that a lot of my changes have been related to variances in IAT. Often times the same cells will toggle from perhaps 0.98 to 1.02 BEN, and it might be that one log was done at say 20*C IAT and another at 30*C IAT.
I am finding that my values are a lot more consistent as a result
Andrew
EFILive Crew