Originally Posted by
dfe1
This thread still seems to be going sideways. If an injector in a sequential system fires against a closed valve, then as cam duration increases, the question is should injector offset be increased or decreased? Lee's testing showed improved performance be increasing offset, but to me that doesn't match the logic of the concept-- unless there's a benefit to firing the injector closer to valve open, or after the valve has opened. The reference pulse has to occur before the injector fires and that being the case, increasing offset will delay injector firing. If the idea is to give fuel more time to vaporize, then offset should be reduced to compensate for an earlier opening intake valve (than with a stock cam).
It's interesting to note that the injection timing tables (B3702) for truck, LS1 and LS6 are identical, (even though cam duration varies quite a bit) although the values for the G van are slightly larger. What's also interesting is that the E40 and E38 ECMs have injector timing versus RPM tables and the values (expressed in degrees) generally increase with rpm. On the other hand, values in the timing versus ECT table (also expressed in degrees) are higher at low coolant temps than they are at higher temps. (Opposite of value change in an LS1 PCM). I'm trying to make sense of all this and not being very successful. Every time I think of a reasonable explanation, I find something that contradicts it. Any ideas?