Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 37

Thread: Rich Idle - Please Help!

  1. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    57

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hquick View Post
    Also...how did you come up with the B3701 table and the others?
    For B3701 I used this speadsheet I found on the Internet (maybe here I can't recall) that uses an equation to extrapolate the table from a given set of base values. Entering the voltage offset values that Ford gave me it give the entire table. I also tweaked some of the excel formulas in the upper voltage ranges (15+) because they were dropping off too fast.
    Attached Files Attached Files
    2001 Camaro SS
    Built 370 LQ9, Ported 243s, D-1SC 14 psi. 691 rwhp, 643 rwtq
    Best time: 11.6@124 on nitto drags with a 2.1 60'
    "if you're gonna build a time machine into a car, why not do it with some style." Dr. Emmett Brown

  2. #12
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    57

    Default

    I wonder if anyone can answer this...

    B4001 Injector Flow Rate says:

    "If the fuel rail pressure is NOT referenced to manifold pressure, then decreasing the manifold pressure has the same effect as increasing the fuel rail pressure. The fuel flow rate of the injectors will increase at higher manifold vacuums (i.e. lower manifold pressure)."

    Now, shouldn't the injectors flow MORE at 0 kPa (perfect vacuum) and LESS at 80 kPa? The stock tables seem backwards.

    Injector Flow Rate from 2001 Z06

    kPA (Grams/Second)
    0 3.671875
    ...
    80 4.023438

    Assuming that the fuel pressure stays constant, flow rate should decrease as the manifold pressure increases (especially from FI). An extreme example, if the fuel rail pressure is 58 psi and boost is 58 psi, wouldn't the IFR be 0 or at least close to zero?

    Back to the Idle Issue.....

    I know this is ugly, but I've been experimenting with an IFR table bumped up under 35 kPa to lean out my idle/cruise.

    It actually help quite a bit in getting the trims inline. Also, when I turned off the MAF the >30 kPa trims came down to negative for the first time since putting on the blower/injectors. Apparently my stock MAF was out 25-50% in the upper freq ranges wreaking havoc on my trims.

    Injector Flow Rate (Grams/Second)
    kPa Value
    0 6.984375
    5 7.000000
    10 7.015625
    15 7.031250
    20 7.046875
    25 7.062500
    30 7.078125
    35 6.773438
    40 6.812500
    45 6.851563
    50 6.882813
    55 6.921875
    60 6.960938
    65 7.000000
    70 7.031250
    75 7.070313
    80 7.109375
    2001 Camaro SS
    Built 370 LQ9, Ported 243s, D-1SC 14 psi. 691 rwhp, 643 rwtq
    Best time: 11.6@124 on nitto drags with a 2.1 60'
    "if you're gonna build a time machine into a car, why not do it with some style." Dr. Emmett Brown

  3. #13
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,400

    Default

    The kPa scale in B4001 is not MAP, but it is MANVAC.

    MANVAC = BARO - MAP

    That's why it looks "backwards", but it's not.

    Perfect vacuum is MAP = 0 kPa (like you said), giving MANVAC = BARO - MAP = 100 - 0 = 100 kPa.
    Zero vacuum is MAP = 100kPa, giving MANVAC = BARO - MAP = 100 - 100 = 0 kPa.

    And that's also why the MANVAC scale only ranges upto 80kPa...
    because at MAP 20 kPa and below, the injectors won't be required to spray much fuel if any.

  4. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    57

    Default

    Thanks Joe! I just read your thread about IFR calculations. Very nice. That makes much more sense now.

    http://forum.efilive.com/showthread.php?t=4821

    So, for the Z06 example:

    kPa (Grams/Second)
    0 3.671875
    ...
    80 4.023438

    WOT would be at 0 kPa, and idle/cruise would be in the 70-80 range?

  5. #15
    Lifetime Member hquick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    1,369

    Default

    Dan...have you seen these values?
    Attached Files Attached Files
    Howard

    YOU ONLY NEED TWO TOOLS IN LIFE - WD-40 AND DUCT TAPE. IF IT DOESN'T
    MOVE AND SHOULD, USE THE WD-40. IF IT SHOULDN'T MOVE AND DOES, USE THE
    DUCT TAPE.
    IF YOU CAN'T FIX IT WITH A HAMMER, YOU'VE GOT AN ELECTRICAL PROBLEM.


    98 K1500 'HOLDEN' Suburban.
    Custom Whipple SC, Mercruiser Marine intake, 0411 PCM, 4L80E w/shift kit

  6. #16
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,400

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by white01ss View Post
    So, for the Z06 example:

    kPa (Grams/Second)
    0 3.671875
    ...
    80 4.023438

    WOT would be at 0 kPa, and idle/cruise would be in the 70-80 range?
    Dan,

    [I hope I got your name right...]

    Yes that is correct.

    Cheers,
    Joe

  7. #17
    Lifetime Member hquick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    1,369

    Default

    Current tune and log...for your reference Dan.
    OLSD, 5.7L Whippled with the 42's.
    Attached Files Attached Files
    Last edited by hquick; April 14th, 2008 at 10:19 AM.
    Howard

    YOU ONLY NEED TWO TOOLS IN LIFE - WD-40 AND DUCT TAPE. IF IT DOESN'T
    MOVE AND SHOULD, USE THE WD-40. IF IT SHOULDN'T MOVE AND DOES, USE THE
    DUCT TAPE.
    IF YOU CAN'T FIX IT WITH A HAMMER, YOU'VE GOT AN ELECTRICAL PROBLEM.


    98 K1500 'HOLDEN' Suburban.
    Custom Whipple SC, Mercruiser Marine intake, 0411 PCM, 4L80E w/shift kit

  8. #18
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    57

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hquick View Post
    Dan...have you seen these values?
    No I haven't seen those before. They seem pretty close to the one's I posted in the 10-12 V range, then they start to deviate quite a bit. I wouldn't trust it too much without specific part numbers because they may have changed them over the years.

    I know my car ran like poop on the stock table and I couldn't believe the difference changing this table made in the drive ability of the car. IMHO, no injector change should be made without getting the offset table, measured flow rate, and min pulse width programmed correctly. But what do I know, I just started in Jan 08!

  9. #19
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,400

    Default

    You're doing fine, don't let post counts fool you...

  10. #20
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    57

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by joecar View Post
    Yes that is correct.

    Cheers,
    Joe
    Thanks!

    So I've been dickin' around with the wrong part of the tables! (IFR, IPWVA) I'm lucky I haven't blown up my freakin' motor. Good thing I've only been doing small changes.
    2001 Camaro SS
    Built 370 LQ9, Ported 243s, D-1SC 14 psi. 691 rwhp, 643 rwtq
    Best time: 11.6@124 on nitto drags with a 2.1 60'
    "if you're gonna build a time machine into a car, why not do it with some style." Dr. Emmett Brown

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. help! rich at idle
    By drdarthinvader in forum Custom Operating Systems
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: December 13th, 2008, 07:00 PM
  2. New cam - rich idle??
    By Tomcat in forum Gen III V8 Specific
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: May 13th, 2008, 08:38 AM
  3. Car Wont Idle And Runs Rich At Idle ( Tune Inside)
    By mikeyayell in forum Gen III V8 Specific
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: January 8th, 2008, 04:17 PM
  4. Idle is rich
    By zapp168 in forum Gen III V8 Specific
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: August 14th, 2007, 10:29 AM
  5. Rich idle
    By gcross in forum Gen III V8 Specific
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: January 10th, 2007, 02:35 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •